PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 70, No. 3, March 1990, pp. 158-164

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delitto, A
Right arrow Articles by Snyder-Mackler, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delitto, A
Right arrow Articles by Snyder-Mackler, L

Article

Two theories of muscle strength augmentation using percutaneous electrical stimulation

A Delitto and L Snyder-Mackler

Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110.

Electrical stimulation of muscle is a commonly used, well-substantiated strategy that physical therapists use to augment strength in patients with muscle weakness. Two distinctly different theories of strength augmentation using percutaneous muscle stimulation are presented. The first theory proposes that augmentation of muscle strength with electrically elicited muscle contractions occurs in a similar manner to augmentation of muscle strength with voluntary exercise. Electrically elicited muscle contractions of relatively high intensity with low numbers of repetitions strengthen muscle proportionally to the external load on the muscle in a manner that is equivalent to voluntary contraction. The second theory proposes that augmentation of muscle strength using percutaneous stimulation is fundamentally different from augmentation of strength with voluntary exercise. This theory uses the physiological differences between electrically elicited and voluntary contractions, such as the reversal of motor unit recruitment order, as a basis for argument. Both theories are partially substantiated using published literature. Strategies for testing both theories are also presented.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. R Piva, E. A Goodnite, K. Azuma, J. D Woollard, B. H Goodpaster, M. C. Wasko, and G K. Fitzgerald
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Volitional Exercise for Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Multiple-Patient Case Report
Physical Therapy, August 1, 2007; 87(8): 1064 - 1077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. Banerjee, B. Caulfield, L. Crowe, and A. Clark
Prolonged electrical muscle stimulation exercise improves strength and aerobic capacity in healthy sedentary adults
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2307 - 2311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Physical Therapy Association.