PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 72, No. 12, December 1992, pp. 865-874

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riddle, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riddle, D.

Article

Measurement of accessory motion: critical issues and related concepts

DL Riddle

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Professions, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298.

The term "manual therapy" has traditionally been associated with physical therapists who examine and treat patients who have disorders related to the musculoskeletal system. In addition to using instruments to collect patient data, these therapists use a large variety of manually applied examination procedures. Range-of-motion tests, manual muscle tests, neurological tests, and palpation tests are just a few of the categories of tests these therapists use as part of the clinical decision-making process. The major sources of error that can affect the usefulness of manually obtained measurements are discussed. The literature that provides the theoretical and clinical bases for the assessment of joint surface movement is thoroughly reviewed. Conclusions are made about what is currently known about the usefulness of accessory motion tests. Suggestions are made for future research needs in order to clarify and enhance the usefulness of accessory motion tests and other examination procedures used by manual therapists.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. Landel, K. Kulig, M. Fredericson, B. Li, and C. M Powers
Intertester Reliability and Validity of Motion Assessments During Lumbar Spine Accessory Motion Testing
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. J Fruth
Differential Diagnosis and Treatment in a Patient With Posterior Upper Thoracic Pain
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2006; 86(2): 254 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A.-T. Hsu, T. Hedman, J. H. Chang, C. Vo, L. Ho, S. Ho, and G.-L. Chang
Changes in Abduction and Rotation Range of Motion in Response to Simulated Dorsal and Ventral Translational Mobilization of the Glenohumeral Joint
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2002; 82(6): 544 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Physical Therapy Association.