PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 72, No. 3, March 1992, pp. 186-190

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, M.
Right arrow Articles by MacMillan, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, M.
Right arrow Articles by MacMillan, M

Article

Reliability of lumbar isometric torque in patients with chronic low back pain

ME Robinson, AF Greene, P O'Connor, JE Graves, and M MacMillan

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.

In this study, the test-retest reliability of lumbar isometric strength testing in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) was assessed. Isometric torque measurements were obtained from 89 patients with CLBP at seven different angles of lumbar flexion. Because previous studies have demonstrated significant strength differences between male and female subjects, separate data analyses were performed for each gender. Results indicated moderate to high reliability for patients with CLBP when tested at individually determined angles of flexion within their idiosyncratic range of motion (ROM) (female subjects: r = .59-.96, P less than .05, SEE = 12.0-24.2 N.m; male subjects: r = .71-.93, P less than .05, SEE = 25.1-62.1 N.m). For comparison with previously published data on asymptomatic controls, an additional set of analyses was conducted for subjects with full lumbar ROM. Similar reliability was demonstrated for this subsample (female subjects: r = .57-.93, P less than .05, SEE = 12.4-27.9 N.m; male subjects: r = .63-.93, P less than .05, SEE = 34.2-44.2 N.m). The authors concluded that isometric lumbar extension torque could be reliably measured in patients with CLBP at multiple positions within the full ROM, although reliability decreased at the most extended positions. The demonstrated reliability will allow researchers to assess treatment effects and group differences without undue concern for artifact attributable to measurement error.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Physical Therapy Association.