PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 72, No. 4, April 1992, pp. 300-305

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vander Linden, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hubbard, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vander Linden, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hubbard, R.

Article

Reproducibility and accuracy of angle measurements obtained under static conditions with the Motion Analysis video system

DW Vander Linden, SJ Carlson, and RL Hubbard

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Related Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.

The development of computerized and semi-automated motion analysis systems has made the study of human motion more widely available in research and clinical settings. Although many of these systems are currently used by physical therapists, the accuracy and reproducibility of some of these systems in estimating joint angles have not been reported. In this study, the accuracy and reproducibility of angle measurements obtained by use of the Motion Analysis video system were evaluated under static conditions using a standard goniometer. Reflective markers placed on a goniometer were recorded by two video cameras at 17 angles, from 20 to 180 degrees, in 10-degree increments. Recordings of the goniometer were made at three locations within the field of view of the cameras. The intraclass correlation coefficient for each location tested was .99. Average within-trial variability was less than 0.4 degree at all locations. A linear regression of the system-calculated angles and reference angles for all locations had slopes near unity (ie, 1) and intercepts that were not statistically different from zero. A preliminary evaluation of the system under dynamic conditions revealed that distances were slightly underestimated, regardless of where the movement occurred within the calibration cube.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
A.-M. Keenan and C. M. Tanner
The Effect of High-Dye and Low-Dye Taping on Rearfoot Motion
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2001; 91(5): 255 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. J Wilson, B. K Smith, J K. Gibson, B. K Choe, B. C Gaba, and J. T Voelz
Accuracy of Digitization Using Automated and Manual Methods
Physical Therapy, June 1, 1999; 79(6): 558 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Physical Therapy Association.