PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 72, No. 6, June 1992, pp. 432-437

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palisano, R.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palisano, R.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D.

Article

Goal attainment scaling as a measure of change in infants with motor delays

RJ Palisano, SM Haley, and DA Brown

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192.

Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is an individualized criterion-referenced measure of change that has several unique features, compared with the behavioral objective, and five possible levels of attainment for each goal. The validity of GAS as a measure of motor change was investigated in 65 infants, 3 to 30 months of age, with motor delays. For each infant, two goals to be attained within a 6-month period of intervention were established. After the 6-month period, the mean GAS T-score of 55.4 was significantly higher than the expected mean of 50. This finding indicated that the infants' motor change exceeded the therapists' expectations. Neither the type nor the category of goal influenced the therapists' ability to select outcomes that the infants were capable of achieving. Because moderate and low correlations were found between GAS T-scores and Peabody gross motor and fine motor change scores, the two assessments appear to measure different aspects of motor development. Selected child, family, and program variables were examined as sources of bias in GAS T-scores. Motor delay was the only variable that biased GAS T-scores; infants who were less delayed had higher GAS T-scores. The results indicate that GAS was responsive to change in individualized motor goals and support the model of GAS as an idiosyncratic measure. The unique features of GAS offer advantages for measurement of motor change compared with the behavioral objective and norm-referenced developmental scales.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. J Palisano
A Collaborative Model of Service Delivery for Children With Movement Disorders: A Framework for Evidence-Based Decision Making
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2006; 86(9): 1295 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. Steenbeek, A. Meester-Delver, J. G Becher, and G. J Lankhorst
The effect of botulinum toxin type A treatment of the lower extremity on the level of functional abilities in children with cerebral palsy: evaluation with goal attainment scaling
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2005; 19(3): 274 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. C Heathcock, A. N Bhat, M. A Lobo, and J. Galloway
The Performance of Infants Born Preterm and Full-term in the Mobile Paradigm: Learning and Memory
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2004; 84(9): 808 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Physical Therapy Association.