Alternative approaches to research in physical therapy: positivism and phenomenology

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Allied Health Professions, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140.

This article presents philosophical approaches to research in physical therapy. A comparison is made to demonstrate how the research purpose, research design, research methods, and research data differ when one approaches research from the philosophical perspective of positivism (predominantly quantitative) as compared with the philosophical perspective of phenomenology (predominantly qualitative). Differences between the two approaches are highlighted by examples from research articles published in Physical Therapy. The authors urge physical therapy researchers to become familiar with the tenets, rigor, and knowledge gained from the use of both approaches in order to increase their options in conducting research relevant to the practice of physical therapy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M Levins, D. M Redenbach, and I. Dyck Individual and Societal Influences on Participation in Physical Activity Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Qualitative Study Physical Therapy, June 1, 2004; 84(6): 496 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E Cromie, V. J Robertson, and M. O Best Physical Therapists Who Claimed Workers' Compensation: A Qualitative Study Physical Therapy, December 1, 2003; 83(12): 1080 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E Cromie, V. J Robertson, and M. O Best Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Culture of Physical Therapy Physical Therapy, May 1, 2002; 82(5): 459 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]