PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 73, No. 6, June 1993, pp. 374-380

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dickstein, R
Right arrow Articles by Pillar, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dickstein, R
Right arrow Articles by Pillar, T

Article

Reaction and movement times in patients with hemiparesis for unilateral and bilateral elbow flexion

R Dickstein, S Hocherman, G Amdor, and T Pillar

Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. This work was designed to study the effects of bilateral elbow flexion on the reaction and movement times of the impaired upper extremity of patients with hemiparesis. SUBJECTS. The subjects consisted of an experimental group of patients with hemiparesis (n = 25) and a control group of age-matched healthy volunteers (n = 26). METHODS. Each subject performed three sets of 16 elbow flexion trials. Two of these sets required unilateral movements, one for each upper extremity. The third set of movements required simultaneous elbow flexions of both upper extremities. In each trial, subjects were instructed to flex their elbows in response to an auditory signal from a supported initial position of 150 degrees through a goal orientation of 120 degrees. "Reaction time" was defined as the time between the auditory signal and movement initiation. "Movement time" was defined as the time between movement initiation and the completion of 30 degrees of elbow flexion. RESULTS. When subjects were asked to bilaterally flex their elbows, the reaction and movement times increased in both extremities. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION. It was speculated that in patients with hemiparesis, movement time of the nonparetic extremity in the bilateral task is limited by the rate of performance of the paretic extremity. The decrease in speed of these performance-determining variables in the bilateral task warrants consideration during physical therapy intervention for patients with hemiparesis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D K Rose and C J Winstein
The co-ordination of bimanual rapid aiming movements following stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2005; 19(4): 452 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. S. Pohl, D. L. Filion, and S. H. Kim
Effects of Practice and Unpredictable Distractors on Planning and Executing Aiming after Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2003; 17(2): 93 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. S. Pohl, C. W. Luchies, J. Stoker-Yates, and P. W. Duncan
Upper Extremity Control in Adults Post Stroke with Mild Residual Impairment
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2000; 14(1): 33 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
R. Dickstein, N. Abulaffio, and T. Pillar
Factors Affecting Reaction and Movement Times in Hemiparetic Patients and in Healthy Subjects
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1996; 10(2): 107 - 114.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Physical Therapy Association.