PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 73, No. 7, July 1993, pp. 421-429

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bashi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Domholdt, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bashi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Domholdt, E

Article

Use of support personnel for physical therapy treatment

HL Bashi and E Domholdt

General Hospital Rehabilitation Center, Eureka, CA 95501.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. This study determined the extent to which unlicensed aides employed in physical therapy settings administer physical therapy treatments. METHODS AND SUBJECTS. A 48-item survey questionnaire was mailed to 300 physical therapists in Indiana. The survey assessed aide utilization and supervision for 21 physical therapy treatments and sought therapists' opinions about the use of aides. RESULTS. One hundred sixty-one responses were received (53.7% return rate). Sixty-eight percent of the respondents indicated that aides were involved in patient treatments at their facilities. Four treatments were given by aides without supervision in the facilities of at least 20% of the respondents: hot/cold packs, whirlpool, paraffin, and ultrasound. Sixty-seven percent of the therapists indicated that their use of aides had presented them with ethical dilemmas, and 73% desired more specific guidelines on aide utilization. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. There was significantly greater unsupervised use of aides when they were not identified as "aides" to consumers than when they were clearly identified. Therapists who approved of the unsupervised use of aides described in a scenario were significantly more likely to use aides in an unsupervised manner. There were no differences in unsupervised use of aides on the basis of setting or hours of aide training.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. L. Swisher
A Retrospective Analysis of Ethics Knowledge in Physical Therapy (1970-2000)
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2002; 82(7): 692 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Physical Therapy Association.