PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

PHYS THER
Vol. 74, No. 10, October 1994, pp. 921-929
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emery, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emery, C

Article

The determinants of treatment duration for congenital muscular torticollis

C Emery

Max Bell Sports Medicine Physiotherapy Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. Although the success of conservative management of congenital muscular torticollis has been well documented, relatively little is known about the determinants of response to treatment, such as treatment duration. The purpose of this study was to determine how factors such as severity of restriction of range of motion, age at initiation of treatment, and presence of a palpable intramuscular fibrotic sternocleidomastoid muscle mass affect treatment duration. SUBJECTS. One hundred one children (mean age = 4 months, SD = 2.87, range = 0.5-15.5) who were diagnosed with congenital muscular torticollis and referred to physical therapy at British Columbia's Children's Hospital (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) prior to 2 years of age were included in the study. METHODS. Following a standardized initial assessment, parents were taught the home treatment program, which included passive stretches of the affected sternocleidomastoid muscle and strengthening exercises for the contralateral side, and positioning and handling skills. Evaluation at 2-week intervals included measurement of passive neck rotation and lateral flexion using an adapted standard goniometer. Treatment duration was defined as the time between initiation of treatment and achievement of full passive neck range of motion. RESULTS. Complete recovery (full passive range of motion) was achieved in all but one of the children in this sample. The mean treatment duration was 4.7 months (SD = 5.06, range = 1-36). Correlations were noted between severity of restriction and treatment duration (r = .31) as well as between presence of a mass and treatment duration (r = .26). Multiple regression analysis revealed that severity of restriction was the strongest predictor of treatment duration. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION. The results of this study will make it possible for therapists to better predict treatment duration at the time of the initial assessment. By providing parents with more precise information about the length of treatment, parents may be more willing to adhere to the exercise program. [Emery C. The determinants of treatment duration for congenital muscular torticollis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
E. M. Snyder and B. D. Coley
Limited Value of Plain Radiographs in Infant Torticollis
Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): e1779 - e1784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J.C.Y. Cheng, M.W.N. Wong, S.P. Tang, T.M.K. Chen, S.L.F. Shum, and E.M.C. Wong
Clinical Determinants of the Outcome of Manual Stretching in the Treatment of Congenital Muscular Torticollis in Infants : A Prospective Study of Eight Hundred and Twenty-one Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2001; 83(5): 679 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Physical Therapy Association.