PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

PHYS THER
Vol. 74, No. 12, December 1994, pp. 1101-1107
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McClure, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dusold, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McClure, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dusold, C

Article

The use of splints in the treatment of joint stiffness: biologic rationale and an algorithm for making clinical decisions

PW McClure, LG Blackburn, and C Dusold

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, PA 19102.

The purpose of this article are (1) to discuss the rationale for using splints to increase range of motion (ROM) and (2) to describe an algorithm that can guide therapists' clinical decisions when splints are used to treat patients who have limited ROM. The primary rationale for using splints is to apply relatively long periods of tensile stress to shortened connective tissues to induce tissue lengthening through biologic remodeling. The process of remodeling is contrasted with more temporary mechanical phenomena that occur in biologic tissues. The proposed algorithm guides the use of splints based on measurements of pain and ROM. We describe three variables of splint use that may be adjusted: frequency, duration, and intensity. The relative importance of each of these variables is discussed. The algorithm is not joint or injury specific and requires continual modification of splint use based on a patient's response to treatment. Deciding which patients are appropriate for end-range splinting and deciding when to discontinue splint use are also discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Adams, J. Burridge, M. Mullee, A. Hammond, and C. Cooper
The clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial
Rheumatology, October 1, 2008; 47(10): 1548 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
N.A. Lannin, I. Novak, and A. Cusick
A systematic review of upper extremity casting for children and adults with central nervous system motor disorders
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 2007; 21(11): 963 - 976.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
S. E. Farmer, P. J. Woollam, J. H. Patrick, A. P. Roberts, and W. Bromwich
Dynamic orthoses in the management of joint contracture
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2005; 87-B(3): 291 - 295.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ptjournalHome page
S. Blanton, S. P Grissom, and L. Riolo
Use of a Static Adjustable Ankle-Foot Orthosis Following Tibial Nerve Block to Reduce Plantar-Flexion Contracture in an Individual With Brain Injury
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2002; 82(11): 1087 - 1097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Physical Therapy Association.