PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 74, No. 8, August 1994, pp. 738-748

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, M.
Right arrow Articles by Iansek, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, M.
Right arrow Articles by Iansek, R

Article

Current status of the motor program

ME Morris, JJ Summers, TA Matyas, and R Iansek

School of Behavioural Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

Motor program theory has provided physical therapists with one approach to understanding how the brain controls movement. Analogous with computer programs that specify the operations of computer hardware, motor programs are thought to contain commands for muscles that allow movements to occur without the need for continuous peripheral feedback. A review of the physical therapy literature reveals many instances in which motor program theory has been used as a theoretical framework for clinical practice. Yet despite the contribution programming theory has made to the advancement of movement science, the motor program construct is currently under considerable threat. Keele's (1968) original definition no longer seems tenable, given the problems of program storage, motor equivalence, movement flexibility, and context-conditioned variability. The finding that researchers from different disciplines define the motor program in a variety of ways adds difficulty to the task of evaluating the efficacy of the model. A critical appraisal of programming theory and its use in physical therapy suggests that clinicians need to reconsider the usefulness of the motor program model as a basis for movement rehabilitation following brain damage and musculoskeletal disorders.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. J. Kargo and D. A. Nitz
Early Skill Learning Is Expressed through Selection and Tuning of Cortically Represented Muscle Synergies
J. Neurosci., December 3, 2003; 23(35): 11255 - 11269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Physical Therapy Association.