Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination

School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to determine the intertherapist reliability of judgments of stiffness and pain at L-1 to L-5 made using posteroanterior (PA) central pressure testing. SUBJECTS. Three pairs of manipulative physical therapists with a minimum of 5 years of experience were asked to rate pain and stiffness in a total of 90 patients with low back pain. METHODS. Each pair of therapists assessed 30 patients within their own clinic, using their preferred technique to perform an examination using the PA central pressure test at the five lumbar levels. Each pair of therapists recorded their ratings of pain and stiffness. Reliability of judgments was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and percentage of exact agreement scores. RESULTS. The ICC values for pain judgments for the group as a whole ranged from .67 to .72, with agreement scores ranging from 31% to 43%. The ICC values for stiffness judgments ranged from .03 to .37, with agreement scores ranging from 21% to 29%. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION. Judgments of stiffness made by experienced manipulative physical therapists examining patients in their own clinics were found to have poor reliability, whereas pain judgments had good reliability. Further investigation of this test is required in order to develop a more reliable method of assessing PA stiffness.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Geyh, G. Stucki, and A. Cieza Author Response Physical Therapy, July 1, 2008; 88(7): 854 - 856. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Landel, K. Kulig, M. Fredericson, B. Li, and C. M Powers Intertester Reliability and Validity of Motion Assessments During Lumbar Spine Accessory Motion Testing Physical Therapy, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J Fruth Differential Diagnosis and Treatment in a Patient With Posterior Upper Thoracic Pain Physical Therapy, February 1, 2006; 86(2): 254 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Childs, J. M. Fritz, T. W. Flynn, J. J. Irrgang, K. K. Johnson, G. R. Majkowski, and A. Delitto A Clinical Prediction Rule To Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely To Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study Ann Intern Med, December 21, 2004; 141(12): 920 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M Fritz, J. M Whitman, T. W Flynn, R. S Wainner, and J. D Childs Factors Related to the Inability of Individuals With Low Back Pain to Improve With a Spinal Manipulation Physical Therapy, February 1, 2004; 84(2): 173 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L Riddle, J. M Rothstein, and J. L Echternach Application of the HOAC II: An Episode of Care for a Patient With Low Back Pain Physical Therapy, May 1, 2003; 83(5): 471 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A Olson, M. T Cibulka, R. M Koldehoff, D. L Riddle, J. K Freburger, and North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research "Skilled Mentors" and Reliability Physical Therapy, December 1, 2002; 82(12): 1265 - 1268. [Full Text]

				J. J Godges, D. R Varnum, and K. M Sanders Impairment-Based Examination and Disability Management of an Elderly Woman With Sacroiliac Region Pain Physical Therapy, August 1, 2002; 82(8): 812 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]