PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 74, No. 9, September 1994, pp. 861-871

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oberg, U
Right arrow Articles by Oberg, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oberg, U
Right arrow Articles by Oberg, T

Article

Validity and reliability of a new assessment of lower-extremity dysfunction

U Oberg, B Oberg, and T Oberg

Department of Physical Therapy, County Hospital, Eksjo, Sweden.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. A 20-variable assessment system for evaluation of lower-extremity dysfunction has been constructed with special consideration of the needs of the physical therapist. The variables are classified into five subgroups: hip impairment, knee impairment, physical disability, social disability, and pain. SUBJECTS. One hundred five patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip and knee, all accepted for total joint replacement arthroplasty, were tested. The mean age of the patients was 69 years (SD = 9.0, range = 46-91). METHODS. The original grouping of the variables was analyzed for content validity with a factor analysis. The results from a subgroup of 42 patients were tested for intertester reliability with the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient. RESULTS. The factor analysis indicated a factor solution consistent with the primary grouping except for two variables. The correlation between two independent physical therapists was .99 to 1.00 for different variables, indicating excellent intertester reliability. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION. In the authors' opinion, the new assessment system provides a reasonably valid, reliable, inexpensive, and easy-to-use measurement and fulfills the needs of the physical therapist for functional evaluation of the lower extremity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. B. Terwee, L. B. Mokkink, M. P. M. Steultjens, and J. Dekker
Performance-based methods for measuring the physical function of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties
Rheumatology, July 1, 2006; 45(7): 890 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. I Strand and S. L Wie
The Sock Test for Evaluating Activity Limitation in Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain
Physical Therapy, February 1, 1999; 79(2): 136 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Physical Therapy Association.