PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 75, No. 12, December 1995, pp. 1082-1088

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, D
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, D
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J

Article

Interrater reliability of auscultation of breath sounds among physical therapists

D Brooks and J Thomas

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although auscultation is routinely used in the assessment of respiratory status, the ability of the rater to accurately and consistently identify lung sounds has been questioned. The literature on this issue is sparse and has focused on reliability of auscultation of tape-recorded rather than in vivo lung sounds. The purposes of this study were to determine the interrater reliability of physical therapists in the direct auscultation of lung sounds based on their clinical experience in chest physical therapy and to determine whether the adoption of standardized nomenclature and education on proper technique and interpretation affects reliability. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A group of 57 registered physical therapists were stratified by clinical experience into four groups. Sixteen therapists (ie, 4 in each stratum) were randomly chosen using a random number table. The following criteria were developed to delineate clinical experience. Group 1 subjects were senior chest physical therapists with at least 5 years of experience in this area of practice. Group 2 subjects were experienced therapists who had a minimum of 2 years of experience in chest physical therapy and were currently practicing in this area. Group 3 subjects were experienced physical therapists in other areas who were also practicing in chest physical therapy on occasional weekend service. Group 4 subjects were new graduates. Ten patients were evaluated by each group of 4 physical therapists using a teaching stethoscope with one diaphragm/bell and four pairs of earpieces. The education session consisted of discussion of the adoption of standardized nomenclature and education on proper technique and interpretation of auscultation. Interrater reliability was assessed before and after the education session using kappa (kappa) values. Comparisons were made between kappa values before and after the education session to determine the effect of education and between groups to determine the effect of clinical experience. RESULTS: The kappa values before the education session were low, indicating poor reliability in detecting specific abnormal sounds (kappa = -.02-.59). Group 1 (seniors in respiratory therapy) and group 4 (new graduates) demonstrated the greatest reliability levels. The lowest kappa values were observed for detecting and categorizing the quality of breath sounds (normal, absent, bronchial, or decreased) (kappa = -.02-.25). Following the education session, there was a general improvement in reliability (kappa = -.30-.77), especially for group 3 (specialists in other areas). The most improvement was noted for the detection of the quality of breath sounds (kappa = .08-.50). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Reliability of auscultation was poor to fair, in general, before the education session. There was a definite improvement in reliability after the education session. There was no clear effect of clinical experience on reliability, and the agreement among observers appeared to depend on the abnormal lung sound present. Limitations of this study and recommendations for future research are discussed. [Brooks D, Thomas J. Interrater reliability of auscultation of breath sounds among physical therapists.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
H E Elphick, G A Lancaster, A Solis, A Majumdar, R Gupta, and R L Smyth
Validity and reliability of acoustic analysis of respiratory sounds in infants
Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 1059 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. L McGinley, P. A Goldie, K. M Greenwood, and S. J Olney
Accuracy and Reliability of Observational Gait Analysis Data: Judgments of Push-off in Gait After Stroke
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2003; 83(2): 146 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Brimacombe, C. Keller, S. Kurian, and J. Myles
Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2002; 88(1): 127 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
H. Kiyokawa, M. Greenberg, K. Shirota, and H. Pasterkamp
Auditory Detection of Simulated Crackles in Breath Sounds
Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1886 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
W. P. Wong
Physical Therapy for a Patient in Acute Respiratory Failure
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2000; 80(7): 662 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. Jones, R D. Jones, K. Kwong, and Y. Burns
Effect of Positioning on Recorded Lung Sound Intensities in Subjects Without Pulmonary Dysfunction
Physical Therapy, July 1, 1999; 79(7): 682 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Physical Therapy Association.