PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 75, No. 2, February 1995, pp. 93-104

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Heijden, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bouter, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Heijden, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bouter, L.

Article

The efficacy of traction for back and neck pain: a systematic, blinded review of randomized clinical trial methods

GJ van der Heijden, AJ Beurskens, BW Koes, WJ Assendelft, HC de Vet, and LM Bouter

Department of Epidemiology, University of Limburg, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic analysis of the literature to assess the efficacy of traction for patients with neck or back pain. SUBJECTS. For this purpose, randomized clinical trials comparing traction with other treatments were selected. METHODS. A computer-aided search of the literature was conducted for relevant articles, followed by blinded assessment of the methods of the studies. The main outcome measures were (1) scoring for quality of the designated conduct of studies (based on a methodological checklist with four main categories: study population, interventions, measurement of effect, and data presentation) and the main conclusions of author(s) with regard to traction and (2) calculation of confidence intervals and power of the studies. RESULTS. Only three studies scored more than 50 points (maximum score = 100 points), suggesting that most of the selected studies were of poor quality. None of these three studies showed favorable results for traction. Only four studies, of which one scored more than 50 points, had an acceptable power (1- beta > 80%). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION. The available reports of studies on the efficacy of traction for back and neck pain do not allow clear conclusions due to the methodological flaws in their design and conduct. Most studies lacked power (1-beta) due to small sample sizes. To date, no conclusions can be drawn about whether a specific traction modality for back or neck pain is effective, or more efficacious than other treatments. There are no clear indications, however, that traction is an ineffective therapy for back and neck pain. Further trials are needed in which much more attention should be paid to proper design and conduct, as well as to clear descriptions of crucial methodological features and results.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Chou and L. H. Huffman
Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline
Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 492 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. I Binder
Cervical spondylosis and neck pain
BMJ, March 10, 2007; 334(7592): 527 - 531.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
F. H. Shen, D. Samartzis, and G. B.J. Andersson
Nonsurgical Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2006; 14(8): 477 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Carette and M. G. Fehlings
Cervical Radiculopathy
N. Engl. J. Med., July 28, 2005; 353(4): 392 - 399.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
A. B. Douglass and E. T. Bope
Evaluation and Treatment of Posterior Neck Pain in Family Practice
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2004; 17(suppl_1): S13 - S22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
E. L. Hurwitz, H. Morgenstern, P. Harber, G. F. Kominski, F. Yu, and A. H. Adams
A Randomized Trial of Chiropractic Manipulation and Mobilization for Patients With Neck Pain: Clinical Outcomes From the UCLA Neck-Pain Study
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2002; 92(10): 1634 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. Smith, N. McMurray, and P. Disler
Early intervention for acute back injury: can we finally develop an evidence-based approach?
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2002; 16(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
K. Mounce
Back pain
Rheumatology, January 1, 2002; 41(1): 1 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
Philadelphia Panel Members, Clinical Specialty Experts, J. Albright, R. Allman, R. P. Bonfiglio, A. Conill, B. Dobkin, A. A Guccione, S. M Hasson, R. Russo, et al.
Philadelphia Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Selected Rehabilitation Interventions for Low Back Pain
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2001; 81(10): 1641 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
Philadelphia Panel Members, Clinical Specialty Experts, J. Albright, R. Allman, R. P. Bonfiglio, A. Conill, B. Dobkin, A. A Guccione, S. M Hasson, R. Russo, et al.
Philadelphia Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Selected Rehabilitation Interventions for Neck Pain
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2001; 81(10): 1701 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. C Li and C. Bombardier
Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: An Exploratory Survey of Therapist Approaches
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2001; 81(4): 1018 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
B. W Koes, R. J P M Scholten, J. M A Mens, and L. M Bouter
Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 1997; 56(4): 214 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Physical Therapy Association.