PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

PHYS THER
Vol. 75, No. 6, June 1995, pp. 539-553
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byl, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Byl, N.

Article

The use of ultrasound as an enhancer for transcutaneous drug delivery: phonophoresis

NN Byl

Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94122, USA.

Phonophoresis is the use of ultrasound (US) to enhance the delivery of topically applied drugs. The purposes of this article are (1) to review the basic principles of transcutaneous drug delivery, (2) to summarize the functional anatomy of the skin pertinent to phonophoresis, (3) to outline the physiological principles of US as an enhancer of topically applied drugs, (4) to review the literature on the efficacy of phonophoresis, (5) to discuss the relevance of US as an enhancer of topical drugs in the practice of physical therapy, and (6) to outline areas of needed research. Seventy-five percent of the studies reviewed reported positive effects of US on local subcutaneous drug diffusion, but some systemic effects were reported. This research review indicates that to maximize the clinical effectiveness of phonophoresis: (1) the topical drug (both the drug and the carrying agent) should transmit US; (2) the skin should be pretreated with US, heating, moistening, or shaving; (3) the patient needs to be positioned to maximize circulation during treatment; (4) a dressing that seals the area and prevents the escape of moisture should be applied after treatment; (5) an intensity of 1.5 W/cm2 should be used to capture both the thermal and nonthermal effects of the US; and (6) low-intensity US (0.5 W/cm2) should be used when treating open wounds or acute injuries. Research is needed to clarify what parameters of US will most efficiently facilitate topical drug diffusion, how often and for what duration US should be used to maximize local absorption of drugs, and which topical drugs can most effectively be used for phonophoresis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ptjournalHome page
Y.-L. Hsieh
Effects of Ultrasound and Diclofenac Phonophoresis on Inflammatory Pain Relief: Suppression of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in Arthritic Rats
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 39 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ptjournalHome page
M. P Johnson
Physical Therapist Management of an Adult With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2005; 85(7): 665 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ptjournalHome page
B. Cagnie, E. Vinck, S. Rimbaut, and G. Vanderstraeten
Phonophoresis Versus Topical Application of Ketoprofen: Comparison Between Tissue and Plasma Levels
Physical Therapy, August 1, 2003; 83(8): 707 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ptjournalHome page
P. C Panus, K. E Ferslew, B. Tober-Meyer, and R. L Kao
Ketoprofen Tissue Permeation in Swine Following Cathodic Iontophoresis
Physical Therapy, January 1, 1999; 79(1): 40 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Physical Therapy Association.