PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 75, No. 7, July 1995, pp. 597-602

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gowland, C
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gowland, C
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, P.

Article

Reliability of the Gross Motor Performance Measure

C Gowland, WF Boyce, V Wright, DJ Russell, CH Goldsmith, and PL Rosenbaum

School of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. The reporting of reliability coefficients and the method of their determination is expected of test developers. The purpose of this study was to estimate the interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability of the Gross Motor Performance Measure, a measure of quality of movement designed to accompany the Gross Motor Function Measure. SUBJECTS. Subjects were 28 children (25 with cerebral palsy, 2 nondisabled, 1 with head injury) between the ages of 1 and 10 years. METHODS. Reliability data were obtained from assessments of 19 therapists. RESULTS. Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability varied from .92 to .96 for the total scores and from .84 to .94 for the five attribute scores. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION. When the Gross Motor Performance Measure was administered by therapists who are familiar with the Gross Motor Function Measure and had a 1-day training workshop, reliability of the total scores was above recommended minimums. Scores of single attributes were less reproducible.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Ketelaar, A. Vermeer, and P. J. Helders
Functional motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic literature review of assessment measures
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1998; 12(5): 369 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
S. K. Campbell
Quantifying the Effects of Interventions for Movement Disorders Resulting From Cerebral Palsy
J Child Neurol, November 1, 1996; 11(1_suppl): S61 - S70.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Physical Therapy Association.