PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 75, No. 7, July 1995, pp. 621-628

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scudds, R.
Right arrow Articles by Scudds, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scudds, R.
Right arrow Articles by Scudds, R.

Research Report

The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on skin temperature in asymptomatic subjects

RJ Scudds, A Helewa, and RA Scudds

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. Several studies have evaluated the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on skin temperature. The results of these studies, however, remain controversial. This study examined the effects of two modes of TENS, compared with a control condition, on skin temperature of the hand and finger. SUBJECTS. Twenty-four asymptomatic subjects (23 female, 1 male) with no previous experience with TENS participated. The subjects ranged in age from 19 to 28 years (means = 23.0, SD = 2.44). METHODS. All subjects participated in a 4-Hz TENS session, a 100-Hz TENS session, and a control (no TENS) session. Electrodes were placed on the medial and lateral aspects of the dorsal surface of the left hand. Each session consisted of a 60-minute stabilization period, a 30-minute stimulation period, and a 30-minute follow-up period. Hand temperature was measured using infrared thermography, and finger temperature was measured using a skin thermistor. RESULTS. Mean hand temperature after low-frequency TENS was 1.69 degrees C warmer than the mean hand temperature following the high-frequency TENS and 1.60 degrees C warmer than after the control condition. No differences in the finger temperature were found among the three conditions. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION. High-intensity, low-frequency TENS prevented cooling of the hand. High- and low-frequency TENS had no effect on finger temperature.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
Z. Khalil and M. Merhi
Effects of Aging on Neurogenic Vasodilator Responses Evoked by Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation: Relevance to Wound Healing
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2000; 55(6): 257B - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Physical Therapy Association.