PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 76, No. 12, December 1996, pp. 1288-1298

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VanSwearingen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brach, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VanSwearingen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brach, J.

Article

The Facial Disability Index: reliability and validity of a disability assessment instrument for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system

JM VanSwearingen and JS Brach

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Disorders of the facial neuromuscular system can result in marked disfigurement of the face and difficulties in activities of daily living such as eating, drinking, and communicating. No systematic means of measuring the disability associated with facial nerve disorders exists. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the reliability and construct validity of the Facial Disability Index (FDI), a disease-specific, self-report instrument for the assessment of disabilities of patients with facial nerve disorders. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The FDI was administered to 46 ambulatory patients of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's Facial Nerve Center. The relationship of the FDI subscale and total scores with clinical impairment measures was determined, and a comparison of the use of the FDI and subscales of the more general SF-36 was made. RESULTS: The FDI subscales produced reliable scores (theta reliability: physical function = .88; social/well-being function = .83). Construct validity of the FDI physical function subscale was demonstrated by a correlation with the clinician's physical examination of facial movement. The FDI social/well-being subscale was associated with the FDI physical function subscale and with a clinical assessment of psychosocial status within a subset of the sample (n = 14). The FDI represented the relationship between impairments, disability, and psychosocial status better than the generic SF-36 did. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The FDI subscales produce reliable measurements, with construct validity for measuring patient-focused focused disability of individuals with disorders of the facial motor system.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Facial Plast SurgHome page
J. S. Rhee and B. T. McMullin
Outcome Measures in Facial Plastic Surgery: Patient-Reported and Clinical Efficacy Measures
Arch Facial Plast Surg, May 1, 2008; 10(3): 194 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
P. Dulguerov, D. Wang, T. V. Perneger, F. Marchal, and W. Lehmann
Videomimicography: The Standards of Normal Revised
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, September 1, 2003; 129(9): 960 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Physical Therapy Association.