PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

PHYS THER
Vol. 76, No. 2, February 1996, pp. 150-156
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehrmann-Feldman, D
Right arrow Articles by Gobeille, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehrmann-Feldman, D
Right arrow Articles by Gobeille, D

Research Report

Physician referral to physical therapy in a cohort of workers compensated for low back pain

D Ehrmann-Feldman, M Rossignol, L Abenhaim, and D Gobeille

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, Sir Mortimer B Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study described the physical therapy referral of workers compensated for back injury; characterized physical therapy by duration and choice of therapeutic techniques; and compared workers who were and were not referred for physical therapy in terms of age, gender, diagnosis, and absence from work. SUBJECT: A cohort of 2,147 subjects were randomly selected from 54,401 workers compensated for back injuries in 1988. METHODS: Each subject was followed for 2 years from date of entry into the study. Data were obtained from the Quebec Worker's Compensation Board computerized files, medical files, and initial reports completed by physical therapists. RESULTS: Of the cohort, 389 subjects (18%) had received physical therapy after referral by their physician. Exercise, heat, ultrasound, back education, manipulation, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation were the most frequently selected treatments. Implementation of physical therapy within 1 month of back injury had a strong protective effect on return to work within 60 days. Female gender and presence of a specific diagnosis were predictors for greater than 60 days' absence. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that physicians request physical therapy services based on certain patient characteristics. Patients who were referred earlier tended to return to work sooner than those who were referred later, which indicates that timing of physical therapy is an important factor in the rehabilitation of workers with low back pain.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ptjournalHome page
S. Poitras, R. Blais, B. Swaine, and M. Rossignol
Management of Work-Related Low Back Pain: A Population-Based Survey of Physical Therapists
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2005; 85(11): 1168 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ptjournalHome page
J. K Freburger, T. S Carey, and G. M Holmes
Management of Back and Neck Pain: Who Seeks Care From Physical Therapists?
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2005; 85(9): 872 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. D. Childs, J. M. Fritz, T. W. Flynn, J. J. Irrgang, K. K. Johnson, G. R. Majkowski, and A. Delitto
A Clinical Prediction Rule To Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely To Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study
Ann Intern Med, December 21, 2004; 141(12): 920 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Physical Therapy Association.