PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 76, No. 3, March 1996, pp. 268-275

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoppink, L.
Right arrow Articles by de Bie, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoppink, L.
Right arrow Articles by de Bie, R.

Article

Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale

LE Schoppink, MW van Tulder, BW Koes, SA Beurskens, and RA de Bie

Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to determine whether a Dutch translation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) retains the high levels of reliability and validity of the original English version and to determine whether it is therefore more practical to translate this scale, and possibly other scales, than to generate language- and culture-specific instruments. SUBJECTS: Subjects were 120 individuals with chronic low back pain. METHODS: The QBPDS was filled out at the beginning of the study, after 1 week, and after 4 months. Reliability was determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients in addition to Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation at the beginning of the study and after 4 months. Validity was examined by correlating the QBPDS scores to external criteria scores at a single point in time (cross-sectional) and over a period of time (longitudinal). RESULTS: Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability were .90. Cronbach's alpha was .95. The cross-sectional construct validity coefficients were .80 (RDQ) and .70 (pain severity). The longitudinal construct validity coefficients were .60 (RDQ), .53 (pain severity), and .35 (course of the complaint). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Our results support previous findings of the English and French versions of the QBPDS. Whether this instrument can be used as an evaluative instrument remains unknown.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. D.D.M. Roelofs, S. M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra, M. N.M. van Poppel, P. Jellema, S. P. Willemsen, M. W. van Tulder, W. van Mechelen, and B. W. Koes
Lumbar Supports to Prevent Recurrent Low Back Pain among Home Care Workers: A Randomized Trial
Ann Intern Med, November 20, 2007; 147(10): 685 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
G. E Bekkering, M. W van Tulder, E. J. Hendriks, M. A Koopmanschap, D. L Knol, L. M Bouter, and R. A. Oostendorp
Implementation of Clinical Guidelines on Physical Therapy for Patients With Low Back Pain: Randomized Trial Comparing Patient Outcomes After a Standard and Active Implementation Strategy
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2005; 85(6): 544 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
G E Bekkering, H J M Hendriks, M W van Tulder, D L Knol, M Hoeijenbos, R A B Oostendorp, and L M Bouter
Effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
H. S. J. Picavet, J. W. S. Vlaeyen, and J. S. A. G. Schouten
Pain Catastrophizing and Kinesiophobia: Predictors of Chronic Low Back Pain
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2002; 156(11): 1028 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Fritz and J. J Irrgang
A Comparison of a Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2001; 81(2): 776 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Physical Therapy Association.