PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 76, No. 7, July 1996, pp. 727-737

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris,
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, , SR
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, L.

Article

Content validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test

Harris SR and LE Daniels

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. shar@unixg.ube.ca

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to assess the content validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test (HINT), a new screening tool designed to detect early signs of cognitive and neuromotor delays in infants with known risk factors. SUBJECTS. A multidisciplinary panel of 26 international experts, including researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, occupational therapy, developmental pediatrics, child neurology, and psychology, was selected to assess, review, and suggest modifications to the HINT. METHODS. A validity questionnaire that was keyed to the three parts of the HINT (background information, parent questionnaire, and infant assessment) and to individual items within each part was mailed to the selected content experts. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS. Twenty experts completed the validity questionnaires, and the remaining 6 experts provided written comments. The experts generally agreed that the items on the initial development edition of the HINT were clearly worded and free of cultural bias. Based on written feedback, additional background information items were added, a fifth question was added to the parent questionnaire portion, and 20 of the 22 infant assessment items were modified. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION. After receiving questionnaire responses and written comments from a panel of 26 experts, the original version of the HINT was modified and printed as development edition 2 in November 1993. This revised edition is currently being used to examine the reliability and validity of the HINT in assessing infants at risk.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
A. Scher, L. Tse, V. E. Hayes, and M. Tardif
Sleep Difficulties in Infants at Risk for Developmental Delays: A Longitudinal Study
J. Pediatr. Psychol., May 1, 2008; 33(4): 396 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. M Megens, S. R Harris, C. L Backman, and V. E Hayes
Known-Groups Analysis of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2007; 87(2): 164 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Physical Therapy Association.