PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 76, No. 9, September 1996, pp. 968-981

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Triggs Nemshick, M
Right arrow Articles by Shepard, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Triggs Nemshick, M
Right arrow Articles by Shepard, K.

Article

Physical therapy clinical education in a 2:1 student-instructor education model

M Triggs Nemshick and KF Shepard

Institute for Physical Therapy Education, Widener University, Chester, PA 19013, USA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this descriptive qualitative field study was to explore a 2:1 student-clinical instructor (CI) model of clinical education and identify factors that promote or interfere with a successful 2:1 clinical education experience. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An initial conceptual framework was developed from the professional literature and researcher experience to bound the study and guide the study design and data analysis. The purposive sample consisted of three CIs and six students participating in a 2:1 clinical education experience. Observational data were collected during the rotation, and all subjects recorded their experiences in journals and participated in postexperience interviews. RESULTS: The data included descriptions of a typical day and themes about communication, advantages and disadvantages, and factors designed to make the 2:1 model feasible. Based on these results, a new conceptual model was developed to describe the key factors that positively influence the 2:1 clinical education model. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: This article presents descriptions of the 2:1 student-CI experience, identifies factors that may contribute to the success of the model, and offers implementation suggestions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. Strohschein, P. Hagler, and L. May
Assessing the Need for Change in Clinical Education Practices
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2002; 82(2): 160 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Physical Therapy Association.