PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 77, No. 10, October 1997, pp. 1097-1106

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendriks, E.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hendriks, E.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R.

Article

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of assessments of impairments and disabilities

EJ Hendriks, JW Brandsma, YF Heerkens, RA Oostendorp, and RM Nelson

Dutch National Institute of Allied Health Professions, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of assessments of impairments and disabilities. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One physical therapist's assessments were examined for intraobserver reliability. Judgments of two pairs of therapists were used to examine interobserver reliability. Reliability was assessed by Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Of the 42 impairments and disabilities assessed by the physical therapist in the intraobserver reliability study, kappa values could be calculated for 33 items. For 31 items (94%), kappa values ranged from .40 to .91, and 2 items (6%) had kappa values of less than .40. To determine interobserver reliability, 37 items were assessed in one practice. Kappa values could be calculated for 34 items, with 30 items (88%) having kappa values ranging from .41 to .80 and 4 items (12%) showing "poor" agreement. In the second practice, 47 items were assessed for interobserver reliability. Kappa values could be calculated for 40 items, with 11 items (27.5%) having kappa values ranging from .41 to .84. Poor agreement was shown for the remaining 29 items (72.5%). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Assessments of impairments and disabilities are potentially reliable. The differences between practices of the interobserver reliability study can be explained by the fact that one of the therapists did not receive training in the use of the assessment form. More generalizable conclusions will require further study with more subjects and therapists.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
E. J. Hendriks, J. J Kerssens, J. Dekker, R. M Nelson, R. A. Oostendorp, and J. van der Zee
One-Time Physical Therapist Consultation in Primary Health Care
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2003; 83(10): 918 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. J Kerssens, E. M Sluijs, P. F. Verhaak, H. J. Knibbe, and I. M. Hermans
Back Care Instructions in Physical Therapy: A Trend Analysis of Individualized Back Care Programs
Physical Therapy, March 1, 1999; 79(3): 286 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Physical Therapy Association.