PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 77, No. 12, December 1997, pp. 1717-1728

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, R.
Right arrow Articles by McManis, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, R.
Right arrow Articles by McManis, B.

Article

Estimates of weight that subjects can lift frequently in functional capacity evaluations

RL Saunders, KL Beissner, and BG McManis

Saunders Therapy Centers, Chaska, Minn., USA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether the maximum weight that can be lifted during 33% to 67% of a workday (weight lifted frequently) can be accurately predicted from other data gathered during a functional capacity evaluation (FCE). The best equations for estimating weight lifted frequently were also identified, and the interrater reliability for measurements obtained during a 6-day FCE was calculated. SUBJECTS: A retrospective chart audit was conducted of clients (36 female, 93 male) who completed 22-hour FCEs during a 6-day period. Ninety subjects had spinal problems, and 39 subjects had injuries not involving the spine. Subjects were randomly assigned to a model estimation group (n = 109) or a cross-validation group (n = 20). METHOD: A stepwise multiple regression analysis identified the best predictors of weight lifted frequently, with subjects lifting from four different heights. The resulting equations were used to predict the weight for the cross-validation group, and predicted weights were compared with observed weights using t tests and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Regression equations explained between 27.3% and 93.0% of the variance in weight, with standard errors of estimation between 1.09 and 5.72. No differences between the mean observed and predicted scores were found when estimates were based on weight only occasionally lifted (maximum weight that could be lifted up to 33% of a workday). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Estimates of weight lifted frequently based on weight lifted occasionally can be made, but the usefulness of these estimates is questionable. Clinicians should use caution when using estimations of weight lifted for return-to-work recommendations. [Saunders RL, Beissner KL, McManis BG. Estimates of weight that subjects can lift frequently in functional capacity evaluations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J Bos, P P F M Kuijer, and M H W Frings-Dresen
Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2002; 59(12): 800 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Physical Therapy Association.