PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 77, No. 12, December 1997, pp. 1741-1746

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, J.

Article

Accuracy of reconstructed angular estimates obtained with the Ariel Performance Analysis System

DJ Wilson, BK Smith, and JK Gibson

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rusk Rehabilitation Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, MO 65212, USA. dan_wilson@pmr.missouri.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Three-dimensional computerized gait analysis continues to grow in use among physical therapists and other clinical specialists interested in quantitative data regarding human ambulation. This study documented the accuracy of reconstructed angular estimates under static and dynamic conditions using the Ariel Performance Analysis System. METHODS: Angular velocity was systematically increased by raising the release position of a T-shaped pendulum. Angular velocities were examined by releasing the pendulum from four angles (0 degree-static, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees). Twelve reference angles were estimated over 20 autodigitized frames for 10 trials at each release position. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) procedures were used to test the hypothesis that the error of angular estimates grows with increasing angular velocity. RESULTS: Mean errors of the reconstructed angles were consistently within +/- 1.0 degree, regardless of angular velocity. An ANOVA revealed a statistically significant angular velocity effect, characterized by release position. The 90-degree release position produced the greatest error, followed by the 120-, 45-, and 0-degree release positions. The error was not significantly different between the 120- and 45-degree release positions. Intraclass correlation coefficients greater than .90 were found for all frame-to-frame angular velocities, except for the 90-degree release position. The angle estimates consistently underestimated the reference angles, regardless of release position. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The results suggest that clinically accurate angular estimates can be obtained across the range of angular velocities used in this study.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. H Hollman, R. H Deusinger, L. R V. Dillen, and M. J Matava
Knee Joint Movements in Subjects Without Knee Pathology and Subjects With Injured Anterior Cruciate Ligaments
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2002; 82(10): 960 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. J Wilson, B. K Smith, J K. Gibson, B. K Choe, B. C Gaba, and J. T Voelz
Accuracy of Digitization Using Automated and Manual Methods
Physical Therapy, June 1, 1999; 79(6): 558 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Physical Therapy Association.