PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 77, No. 2, February 1997, pp. 155-163

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haskins, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elbaum, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haskins, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elbaum, L

Research Report

Covert bias in evaluation of physical therapist students' clinical performance

AR Haskins, C Rose-St Prix, and L Elbaum

Department of Physical Therapy, Florida International University, Miami 33199, USA. haskins@servms.fiu.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Physical therapist education programs rely on physical therapy practitioners to evaluate the performance of students during clinical affiliations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether covert bias exists in the evaluative judgments of physical therapy practitioners. SUBJECTS: A convenience sample of 83 physical therapists attending the fall conference of the Florida Physical Therapy Association was selected. The subjects, 31 men and 52 women (73 white, 3 black, and 7 Hispanic), had a mean age of 41.5 years (SD = 8.2, range = 26-73). METHODS: Four female physical therapist students (1 white, 1 Hispanic, 1 Asian, and 1 black) were videotaped reciting identical scripts about a patient's status. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of four groups and read a case study about the patient, viewed one videotape, and rated the student's presentation on a form developed by the researchers. RESULTS: The white, Hispanic, and Asian students received higher ratings than the black student on two factors: clarity of presentation and overall rating. The white and Hispanic students received a higher rating than the black student on maintaining interest. The white and the Asian students received a higher rating than the black student on communication of appropriate information. The white student received a higher rating than the black student on organization of information. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The black student consistently received low ratings, indicating that racial or ethnic bias may influence the opinions of physical therapy practitioners. These results justify further exploration of the effect of race and ethnicity on student evaluation in the clinic.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. Sorrell, A. R Haskins, and N. Kirk-Sanchez
Minority Recruitment and Retention
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2006; 86(5): 756 - 759.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. L. Swisher
A Retrospective Analysis of Ethics Knowledge in Physical Therapy (1970-2000)
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2002; 82(7): 692 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
K. W Hayes, G. Huber, J. Rogers, and B. Sanders
Behaviors That Cause Clinical Instructors to Question the Clinical Competence of Physical Therapist Students
Physical Therapy, July 1, 1999; 79(7): 653 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Physical Therapy Association.