PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 77, No. 9, September 1997, pp. 904-917

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Di Fabio, R.
Right arrow Articles by Seay, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Di Fabio, R.
Right arrow Articles by Seay, R

Article

Use of the "fast evaluation of mobility, balance, and fear" in elderly community dwellers: validity and reliability

RP Di Fabio and R Seay

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA. difab001@maroon.tc.umn.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Identifying elderly community dwellers who are at risk for falling was assessed using a comprehensive screening tool referred to as the "Fast Evaluation of Mobility, Balance, and Fear" (FEMBAF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the concurrent validity and reliability of scores on the FEMBAF. SUBJECTS: Thirty-five elderly persons living in the community (4 men, 31 women), with a mean age 79.9 years (SD = 8.5, range = 60-92), participated. METHODS: Subjects were tested using the FEMBAF and three other instruments-the balance subscale of the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (B-POMA), the Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (CTSIB), and the Timed Up and Go Test. Scores on the FEMBAF were compared with scores on each the other instruments using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients and analysis of covariance (with age as the covariate) for living status and diagnostic category. A comparison of the number of subjects classified as being at risk for falling was done descriptively for the FEMBAF, B-POMA, and CTSIB. RESULTS: Associations (r > .35) were found between the FEMBAF and each of the other instruments in the areas of FEMBAF risk-factor count, task completion, mobility, and strength. The FEMBAF classified a greater number of subjects as being at risk for falling (89%) compared with the B-POMA (43%) and the CTSIB (63%). The mean chance-corrected percentage of agreement between raters on the FEMBAF was kappa = .95 (SD = .15) for assessment of risk factors and kappa = .96 (SD = .12) for task completion. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The FEMBAF provides valid and reliable measurements of risk factors, functional performance, and factors that hinder mobility.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M.-R. Lin, H.-F. Hwang, Y.-W. Wang, S.-H. Chang, and S. L Wolf
Community-Based Tai Chi and Its Effect on Injurious Falls, Balance, Gait, and Fear of Falling in Older People
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2006; 86(9): 1189 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
T. M Steffen, T. A Hacker, and L. Mollinger
Age- and Gender-Related Test Performance in Community-Dwelling Elderly People: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and Gait Speeds
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2002; 82(2): 128 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Physical Therapy Association.