PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 1, January 1998, pp. 52-61

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crout, K.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crout, K.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D.

Article

Physical therapists' opinions and practices regarding direct access

KL Crout, JH Tweedie, and DJ Miller

HealthAlliance-Fairlawn Nursing Center, Leominster, MA 01453, USA. crout79@aol.com

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study examined whether differences exist about physical therapists' opinions and practices regarding the use of direct access between therapists practicing in Massachusetts, a direct-access state, and therapists practicing in Connecticut, a state that allows only evaluation without referral. A second purpose was to examine direct-access practices of therapists in Massachusetts. SUBJECTS: A sample of 329 therapists in Massachusetts and 179 therapists in Connecticut were surveyed. METHODS: A cover letter, questionnaire, and return-reply envelope were mailed to each therapist. Independent group t tests and chi-square analyses were used to determine whether therapists' opinions about direct access differed between states. Frequencies were calculated to examine direct-access practices of therapists in Massachusetts. RESULTS: Adjusted response rates were 65.5% in Massachusetts and 57.9% in Connecticut. Therapists in both states were equally supportive of direct access (74.9%). Therapists in Connecticut were more supportive of three stipulations regulating direct access than therapists in Massachusetts were. In Massachusetts, 34.0% of the respondents stated that they practiced using direct access, and 8.8% of the patients seen by the therapists sampled were treated without physicians' referrals. The therapists indicated that the most common reasons for limited use of direct access were employer policies and lack of insurance reimbursement. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Therapists in Connecticut favored more stipulation regulating direct access than therapists in Massachusetts did. Although therapists in both states appear to be supportive of direct access, the number of patients in Massachusetts seen through this mode of care appears to be limited because of practice and financial restraints.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
C. J Leemrijse, I. C. Swinkels, and C. Veenhof
Direct Access to Physical Therapy in the Netherlands: Results From the First Year in Community-Based Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy, August 1, 2008; 88(8): 936 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. U Jette, K. Ardleigh, K. Chandler, and L. McShea
Decision-Making Ability of Physical Therapists: Physical Therapy Intervention or Medical Referral
Physical Therapy, December 1, 2006; 86(12): 1619 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.