PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 12, December 1998, pp. 1288-1298

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ladyshewsky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Drake, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ladyshewsky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Drake, V.

Article

A comparison of productivity and learning outcome in individual and cooperative physical therapy clinical education models

RK Ladyshewsky, SC Barrie, and VM Drake

School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University of Technology, Shenton Park, Western Australia, Australia. r.ladyshewsky@info.curtin.edu.au

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This program evaluation was designed to evaluate productivity and the learning processes used during individual and cooperative clinical education experiences. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Clinical instructors (n=23) and senior students (n=20) at the bachelor's degree level who were engaged in an individual learning experience at an Australian school provided workload productivity data on their daily patient care, administration, and teaching activities. An evaluation of the teaching and learning processes was conducted via questionnaire at the end of the experience. This same information was provided by a group of clinical instructors (n=8) and senior students (n=16) who were engaged in a cooperative learning experience. RESULTS: Clinical instructors in both learning experiences had to reduce their normal levels of productivity to supervise the students. The amount of patient care provided by students, however, compensated for this reduction in clinical instructor productivity. The extent of productivity gains in areas other than patient care were greater for the cooperative learning experience. Clinical instructors and students rated the individual and cooperative learning experiences similarly, although the students rated 3 particular learning processes more highly in the cooperative learning experience. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Advantages with respect to patient care, teaching, and administrative productivity were identified for each learning experience. From the perspective of the students, the cooperative learning experience appeared to provide additional educational benefits.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. M Fitzgerald, A. Delitto, and J. J Irrgang
Validation of the Clinical Internship Evaluation Tool
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2007; 87(7): 844 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. Strohschein, P. Hagler, and L. May
Assessing the Need for Change in Clinical Education Practices
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2002; 82(2): 160 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.