PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 479-489

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murney, M.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murney, M.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S.

Article

The ecological relevance of the Test of Infant Motor Performance elicited scale items

ME Murney and SK Campbell

University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) is a new test of motor and postural control for infants under 4 months of age. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the environmental demands placed on infants in daily life and the demands placed on infants during administration of the TIMP Elicited Scale items. SUBJECTS: Twenty-two preterm and full-term infants and their caregivers participated. The infants were evenly divided into groups at low and high medical risk for developmental disability. METHODS: The infants were videotaped while being handled by their caregiver during undressing, bathing, dressing, and 5 minutes of playing in their natural setting (home or hospital). Each videotape recording was analyzed for the environmental demands that were placed on the infant during caregiving. Demands were coded according to predefined definitions, which represented descriptions for administering TIMP items. Interrater agreement for coding of observations ranged from 80% to 96%. RESULTS: Environmental demands that corresponded to 23 of the 25 TIMP items were observed during caregiving activities. The number of environmental demands placed on the infants during caregiving that corresponded to the 25 TIMP Elicited Scale items ranged from 16% to 68% of the items (mean = 37%). The mean rate of all environmental demands placed on the infants was 3.23 per minute, and the mean rate of demands that corresponded to TIMP items was 1.58 per minute. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Approximately 50% of all environmental demands placed on the infants during caregiving corresponded to TIMP Items, and 98% of TIMP Elicited Scale Items Corresponded to the observed environmental demands. The demands placed on infants during administration of the TIMP appear representative of typical environmental demands.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. K Campbell
Are Models of Disability Useful in Real Cases? Pediatric Case Examples Realized in Research, Clinical Practice, and Education
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2006; 86(6): 881 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. Flegel and T. HA Kolobe
Predictive Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance as Measured by the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency at School Age
Physical Therapy, August 1, 2002; 82(8): 762 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.