PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 490-501

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neumann, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neumann, D.

Research Report

Hip abductor muscle activity as subjects with hip prostheses walk with different methods of using a cane

DA Neumann

Program in Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881, USA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Using a cane held contralateral to a prosthetic hip is presumed to be an effective way to reduce the demands on the hip abductor (HA) muscles and, therefore, the forces on the implant. In this study, surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured from the HA muscles to test this notion. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four active subjects (9 female, 15 male) with unilateral prosthetic hips were tested. The subjects, aged 40 to 86 years (mean = 63.3, SD = 10.7), were not regular cane users. METHODS: Surface EMG activity and cane force were analyzed while the subjects walked with the cane held (1) contralateral to the prosthesis (CL-CANE), (2) ipsilateral to the prosthesis (IL-CANE), and (3) contralateral to the prosthesis with instructions for the subject to push with a "near-maximal effort" (CL-CANE+). RESULTS: Only the following conditions showed a change in HA muscle EMG activity as compared with not using a cane: CL-CANE = -31.1%, CL-CANE+ = -42.3%. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Holding the cane contralateral to the prosthetic hip appears to be an effective method of reducing demands on the HA muscles.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
G. L Soderberg and L. M Knutson
A Guide for Use and Interpretation of Kinesiologic Electromyographic Data
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2000; 80(5): 485 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. A Neumann
An Electromyographic Study of the Hip Abductor Muscles as Subjects With a Hip Prosthesis Walked With Different Methods of Using a Cane and Carrying a Load
Physical Therapy, December 1, 1999; 79(12): 1163 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. A Neumann
Author Response
Physical Therapy, December 1, 1999; 79(12): 1175 - 1176.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.