PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 6, June 1998, pp. 593-601

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chesworth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chesworth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, S.

Article

Movement diagram and "end-feel" reliability when measuring passive lateral rotation of the shoulder in patients with shoulder pathology

BM Chesworth, JC MacDermid, JH Roth, and SD Patterson

London Health Sciences Centre-Victoria Campus, Ontario, Canada. bert@biostats.uwo.ca

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Findings related to joint function can be recorded with movement diagrams or by characterizing the "end-feel" according to the procedure described by Cyriax. Because both methods are used to classify pain and resistance in relation to joint range of motion (ROM), the purpose of this study was to simultaneously evaluate the reliability of these categorizations in a patient sample. SUBJECTS: Two physical therapists performed 2 assessments of passive lateral rotation of the shoulder in 34 patients. METHODS: Pain and resistance findings were recorded using movement diagrams and end-feel categories. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC[2,1]) were used to analyze the ratio (movement diagram) data, and kappa statistics (kappa) were used to analyze the categorical (end-feel) data. RESULTS: Intrarater ICCs varied from .58 to .89. Interrater ICCs for locating maximum pain and resistance in joint ROM varied from .85 to .91. Other interrater ICCs were lower (ICC = .34-.88). Intrarater kappa values for end-feel were moderate (kappa = .48-.59), and interrater kappa values were substantial (kappa = .62-.76). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Movement diagram measures conceptually related to the end of joint ROM and end-feel were highly reliable. This finding and the fact that additional end-feel categories were introduced in the study may partially explain the end-feel reliability findings. Consideration of their use in future studies may help to determine their clinical utility.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L D de Jong, A Nieuwboer, and G Aufdemkampe
Contracture preventive positioning of the hemiplegic arm in subacute stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2006; 20(8): 656 - 667.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Whitman, J. M Fritz, and R. E Boyles
Is there evidence that performing joint manipulation under local anesthetic block might be more effective than continuing a program of joint mobilization, stretching, and mobility exercises in a woman with recalcitrant adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder?
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2003; 83(5): 486 - 496.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. S. Ellenbecker, A. J. Mattalino, E. Elam, and R. Caplinger
Quantification of Anterior Translation of the Humeral Head in the Throwing Shoulder: Manual Assessment Versus Stress Radiography
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2000; 28(2): 161 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.