PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 8, August 1998, pp. 867-888

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lechner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lechner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, L.

Article

Detecting sincerity of effort: a summary of methods and approaches

DE Lechner, SF Bradbury, and LA Bradley

Division of Physical Therapy, School of Health-Related Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35284, USA. dlechner@uab.edu

Despite the widespread use of methods that are supposed to detect the sincerity of patients' efforts in clinical assessment, little has been written summarizing the literature that addresses the reliability and validity of measurements obtained with these methods. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the reliability and validity of scores for Waddell's nonorganic signs, descriptions of pain behavior and symptom magnification, coefficients of variation, correlations between musculoskeletal evaluation and function, grip measurements, and the relationship between heart rate and pain intensity. The authors of the articles reviewed conclude that none of these methods have been examined adequately. Some of these methods, such as Waddell's nonorganic signs, were not developed for the purpose of detecting sincerity of effort. Clinicians are encouraged to critically read the literature addressing these methods. With further research, some of the discussed methods may prove useful. Until such research is reported in the peer-reviewed literature, however, clinicians should avoid basing evaluation of sincerity of effort on these tests. Therapists are encouraged, instead, to use a biobehavioral approach to better understand and address the complex factors underlying delayed recovery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Chaler, Z. Dvir, U. Diaz, S. Quintana, A. Abril, C. Unyo, and R. Garreta
Identification of feigned maximal shoulder external rotation effort
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2007; 21(3): 241 - 247.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J Bos, P P F M Kuijer, and M H W Frings-Dresen
Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2002; 59(12): 800 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.