PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 9, September 1998, pp. 951-963

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riddle, D.
Right arrow Articles by Stratford, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riddle, D.
Right arrow Articles by Stratford, P.

Article

Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders

DL Riddle and PW Stratford

Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298-0224, USA. driddle@hsc.vcu.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few data exist to support the use of functional status measures on patients with disorders of the cervical spine. This study was designed to compare the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 146) with a variety of disorders of the cervical spine completed the NDI and the SF-36 prior to treatment. Following discharge from treatment, 69 of these patients completed a second NDI and SF-36. RESULTS: There was evidence for the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the NDI and the physical and mental component scores of the SF-36. The ability of the NDI and SF-36 to detect change varied, depending on the construct tested. The SF-36 was superior in some instances, and the NDI was superior in other instances. The NDI appears to measure both mental and physical health-related factors. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: There appears to be substantial overlap between the 2 measures. The use of both measures, therefore, is probably not necessary. [Riddle DL, Stratford PW. Use of generic versus region-specific functional measures on patients with cervical spine disorders.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Fritz and G. P Brennan
Preliminary Examination of a Proposed Treatment-Based Classification System for Patients Receiving Physical Therapy Interventions for Neck Pain
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2007; 87(5): 513 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
G. P Brennan, J. M Fritz, and S. J Hunter
Impact of Continuing Education Interventions on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Neck Pain Who Received Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2006; 86(9): 1251 - 1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
T. T. Chiu, T.-H. Lam, and A. J Hedley
Psychometric properties of a generic health measure in patients with neck pain
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2005; 19(5): 505 - 513.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. White, G. Lewith, P. Prescott, and J. Conway
Acupuncture versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Ann Intern Med, December 21, 2004; 141(12): 911 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
K. M Hermann and C S. Reese
Relationships Among Selected Measures of Impairment, Functional Limitation, and Disability in Patients With Cervical Spine Disorders
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2001; 81(3): 903 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.