Reliability of physical examination items used for classification of patients with low back pain

Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicie, St Louis, MO, USA. vandille@medicine.wustl.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the interrater reliability of measurements obtained by examiners administering tests proposed to be important for classifying low back pain (LBP) problems. SUBJECTS: Ninety-five subjects with LBP (41 men, 54 women) and 43 subjects without LBP (17 men, 26 women) were examined by 5 therapists trained in the techniques used. METHODS: A manual was developed by the first author that described the clinical examination procedures. The therapists were trained by the first author in the test procedures and definitions. The training included instruction through videotapes, practice and a written examination. Each examination was conducted by a pair of therapists. Within a pair, a therapist was the primary examiner for half of the subjects and an observer was the primary examiner for half of the subjects. Examination findings were recorded independently, without discussion. RESULTS: Percentage of agreement and generalized kappa coefficients were used to analyzed the data. Kappa values were > or = .75 for all 28 items related to the symptoms elicited and > or = .40 for 72% of the 25 items related to alignment and movement. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The results suggest that experienced therapist who had trained together were able to agree on the results of examinations and obtain an acceptable level of reliability. Future work should focus on testing of reliability when more than one therapist performs the examination and when therapist not trained by the test developer to administer the examination perform the tests. [Van Dillen LR, Sahrmann SA, Norton BJ, et al. Reliability of physical examination items used for classification of patients with low back pain.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A Coffin-Zadai Disabling Our Diagnostic Dilemmas Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 641 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P Gombatto, D. R Collins, S. A Sahrmann, J. R Engsberg, and L. R Van Dillen Patterns of Lumbar Region Movement During Trunk Lateral Bending in 2 Subgroups of People With Low Back Pain Physical Therapy, April 1, 2007; 87(4): 441 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Z George and A. Delitto Clinical Examination Variables Discriminate Among Treatment-Based Classification Groups: A Study of Construct Validity in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Physical Therapy, April 1, 2005; 85(4): 306 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R Van Dillen, S. A Sahrmann, and J. M Wagner Classification, Intervention, and Outcomes for a Person With Lumbar Rotation With Flexion Syndrome Physical Therapy, April 1, 2005; 85(4): 336 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J Mueller and K. S Maluf Tissue Adaptation to Physical Stress: A Proposed "Physical Stress Theory" to Guide Physical Therapist Practice, Education, and Research Physical Therapy, April 1, 2002; 82(4): 383 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Watson, K. S Maluf, S. A Sahrmann, L. R Van Dillen, J. M Rothstein, R. Maeda, K. S Maluf, S. A Sahrmann, and L. R Van Dillen Management of Low Back Pain Physical Therapy, May 1, 2001; 81(5): 1147 - 1154. [Full Text]

				S. Poiraudeau, V. Foltz, J.-L. Drape, J. Fermanian, M. M. Lefevre-Colau, M. A. Mayoux-Benhamou, and M. Revel Value of the bell test and the hyperextension test for diagnosis in sciatica associated with disc herniation: comparison with Lasegue's sign and the crossed Lasegue's sign Rheumatology, April 1, 2001; 40(4): 460 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S Maluf, S. A Sahrmann, and L. R Van Dillen Use of a Classification System to Guide Nonsurgical Management of a Patient With Chronic Low Back Pain Physical Therapy, November 1, 2000; 80(11): 1097 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]