PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 80, No. 5, May 2000, pp. 477-484

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Field-Fote, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Field-Fote, E. C.

Perspectives

Spinal Cord Control of Movement: Implications for Locomotor Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury

Edelle Carmen Field-Fote

EC Field-Fote, PT, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Division of Physical Therapy and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, 5915 Ponce de Leon Blvd, 5th Floor, Coral Gables, FL 33146 (USA) (edee{at}miami.edu)

In recent years, our understanding of the spinal cord's role in movement control has been greatly advanced. Research suggests that body weight support (BWS) walking and functional electrical stimulation (FES), techniques that are used by physical therapists, have potential to improve walking function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), perhaps long after the stage of spontaneous recovery. Walking is one of the most desired goals of people with SCI; however, we are obligated to be judicious in our claims of locomotor recovery. There are few controlled studies that compare outcomes of BWS training or FES with those of conventional interventions, and access to services using BWS training or FES may be restricted under managed care.

Key Words: Body weight support • Central pattern generator • Gait training • Locomotion • Spinal cord injury




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Lee and J. Hidler
Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 747 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. L Behrman, M. G Bowden, and P. M Nair
Neuroplasticity After Spinal Cord Injury and Training: An Emerging Paradigm Shift in Rehabilitation and Walking Recovery
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2006; 86(10): 1406 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
E. C. Field-Fote and D. Tepavac
Improved Intralimb Coordination in People With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Following Training With Body Weight Support and Electrical Stimulation
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2002; 82(7): 707 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
C G INMAN
Long term effects of locomotor training in spinal humans
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2001; 71(1): 6 - 6.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Physical Therapy Association.