| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Research Reports |
Y Laufer, PT, PhD, is Head of the Physical Therapy Program, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Studies, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel (yocheved{at}research.haifa.ac.il). She was Visiting Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Marymount University, Arlington, Va, at the time of the study.
JD Ries, PT, MA, GCS, is Assistant Professor, Physical Therapy Program, Marymount University
PM Leininger, PT, MS, OCS is Lecturer, Physical Therapy Department, The University of Scranton, Scranton, Pa. He was Instructor, Physical Therapy Department, Howard University, Washington, DC, at the time of the study
G Alon, PT, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Physical Therapy Department, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md
Address all correspondence to Dr Laufer
Background and Purpose. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is used by physical therapists to improve muscle performance. Optimal forms of stimulation settings are yet to be determined, as are possible sex-related differences in responsiveness to electrical stimulation. The objectives of the study were: (1) to compare the ability of 3 different waveforms to generate isometric contractions of the quadriceps femoris muscles of individuals without known impairments, (2) to compare muscle fatigue caused by repeated contractions induced by these same waveforms, and (3) to examine the effect of sex on muscle force production and fatigue induced by electrical stimulation. Subjects. Fifteen women and 15 men (mean age=29.5 years, SD=5.4, range=22–38) participated in the study. Methods. A portable battery-operated stimulator was used to generate either a monophasic or biphasic rectangular waveform. A stimulator that was plugged into an electrical outlet was used to generate a 2,500-Hz alternating current. Phase duration, frequency, and on-off ratios were kept identical for both stimulators. Participants did not know the type of waveform being used. Torque was measured using a computerized dynamometer: a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the right quadriceps femoris muscle set at 60 degrees of knee flexion was determined during the first session. In each of the 3 testing sessions, torque of contraction and fatigue elicited by one waveform were measured. Order of testing was randomized. Torque elicited by electrical stimulation was expressed as a percentage of average MVIC. A mixed-model analysis of variance was used to determine the effect of stimulation and sex on strength of contraction and fatigue. Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests were used to further distinguish between the effects of the 3 stimulus waveforms. Results. The results indicated that the monophasic and biphasic waveforms generated contractions with greater torque than the polyphasic waveform. These 2 waveforms also were less fatiguing. The torques from the maximally tolerated electrically elicited contractions were greater for the male subjects than for the female subjects. Discussion and Conclusion. Muscle torque and fatigue of electrically induced contractions depend on the waveform used to stimulate the contraction, with monophasic and biphasic waveforms having an advantage over the polyphasic waveform. All tested waveforms elicited, on average, stronger contractions in male subjects than in female subjects when measured as a percentage of MVIC.
Key Words: Fatigue • Neuromuscular electrical stimulation • Torque • Waveform
Related Article
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Physical Therapy 2002 82: 93.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. R Ward Electrical Stimulation Using Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Current Physical Therapy, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 181 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Laufer and M. Elboim Effect of Burst Frequency and Duration of Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Currents and of Low-Frequency Pulsed Currents on Strength of Contraction, Muscle Fatigue, and Perceived Discomfort Physical Therapy, October 1, 2008; 88(10): 1167 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R Ward and W. G Oliver Comparison of the Hypoalgesic Efficacy of Low-Frequency and Burst-Modulated Kilohertz Frequency Currents Physical Therapy, August 1, 2007; 87(8): 1056 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R Ward, W. G Oliver, and D. Buccella Wrist Extensor Torque Production and Discomfort Associated With Low-Frequency and Burst-Modulated Kilohertz-Frequency Currents Physical Therapy, October 1, 2006; 86(10): 1360 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L Lyons, J. B Robb, J. J Irrgang, and G K. Fitzgerald Differences in Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Torque When Using a Clinical Electrical Stimulator Versus a Portable Electrical Stimulator Physical Therapy, January 1, 2005; 85(1): 44 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Ambrosino and S. Strambi New strategies to improve exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2004; 24(2): 313 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R Ward and N. Shkuratova Russian Electrical Stimulation: The Early Experiments Physical Therapy, October 1, 2002; 82(10): 1019 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
