HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ward, A. R Articles by Shkuratova, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ward, A. R Articles by Shkuratova, N.

Russian Electrical Stimulation: The Early Experiments

AR Ward, PhD, is Senior Lecturer, Department of Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia (a.ward{at}latrobe.edu.au). Address all correspondence to Dr Ward
N Shkuratova, PT, is a practicing physiotherapist and postgraduate student in the School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University

Russian forms of electrical stimulation became popular to a large extent as a result of the activities of Kots, who claimed force gains of up to 40% in elite athletes as a result of what was then a new form of stimulation. He did not provide details of his published work, nor did he give references. Russian electrical stimulation became popular despite the lack of research in the English-language literature. No studies published in English examined whether the "10/50/10" treatment regimen (10 seconds of stimulation followed by 50 seconds rest, repeated for 10 minutes) advocated by Kots is optimal, and only one study addressed whether maximum muscle torque was produced at an alternating current frequency of 2.5 kHz. The few studies that compared low-frequency monophasic pulsed current and Russian electrical stimulation are inconclusive. This article reviews and provides details of the original studies by Kots and co-workers. The authors contend that these studies laid the foundations for the use of Russian forms of electrical stimulation in physical therapy. The authors conclude that there are data in the Russian-language literature that support the use of Russian electrical stimulation but that some questions remain unanswered.

Key Words: Alternating current • Electrical stimulation • Kilohertz frequencies • Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Laufer and M. Elboim Effect of Burst Frequency and Duration of Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Currents and of Low-Frequency Pulsed Currents on Strength of Contraction, Muscle Fatigue, and Perceived Discomfort Physical Therapy, October 1, 2008; 88(10): 1167 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R Ward, W. G Oliver, and D. Buccella Wrist Extensor Torque Production and Discomfort Associated With Low-Frequency and Burst-Modulated Kilohertz-Frequency Currents Physical Therapy, October 1, 2006; 86(10): 1360 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]