HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, M. I Articles by Tabasam, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnson, M. I Articles by Tabasam, G.

An Investigation Into the Analgesic Effects of Interferential Currents and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Experimentally Induced Ischemic Pain in Otherwise Pain-Free Volunteers

MI Johnson, PhD, is Principal Lecturer in Human Physiology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environment, Leeds Metropolitan University, Calverly St, Leeds LS1 3HE, United Kingdom (M.Johnson{at}LMU.ac.uk).
G Tabasam, PhD, is Lecturer in Human Physiology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environment, Leeds Metropolitan University

Address all correspondence to Dr Johnson

Background and Purpose. Interferential currents (IFC) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are used for pain management. This study compared the analgesic effects of IFC and TENS on experimentally induced ischemic pain in otherwise pain-free subjects using a modified version of the submaximal-effort tourniquet technique. Subjects. The subjects were 30 volunteers (18 male, 12 female) without known pathology that could cause pain. Their mean age was 33.5 years (SD=9.9, range=21–54). Method. A single-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group method was used. The primary outcome measure was the change in the self-report of pain intensity during 1 of 3 possible interventions: (1) IFC, (2) TENS, or (3) sham electrotherapy. The IFC and TENS were administered on the forearm, and the sham electrotherapy group received no current output via a dummy stimulator. Results. A 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that there was no change in pain intensity during treatment when all 3 groups were considered together. Further analysis revealed that IFC reduced pain intensity when compared with sham electrotherapy but not when compared only with TENS. Discussion and Conclusion. There were no differences in the magnitude of analgesia between IFC and TENS. Interferential currents reduced pain intensity to a greater extent than sham electrotherapy.

Key Words: Analgesia • Experimentally induced pain • Interferential currents • Submaximal effort tourniquet test • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Jorge, C. A Parada, S. H Ferreira, and C. H Tambeli Interferential Therapy Produces Antinociception During Application in Various Models of Inflammatory Pain Physical Therapy, June 1, 2006; 86(6): 800 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Schubert, I. H. Lorenz, F. Zschiegner, C. Kremser, M. Hohlrieder, M. Biebl, C. Kolbitsch, and P. L. Moser Testing of a new pneumatic device to cause pain in humans Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2004; 92(4): 532 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]