HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bonifer, N. Articles by Anderson, K. M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bonifer, N. Articles by Anderson, K. M

Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for an Individual With Severe Chronic Upper-Extremity Hemiplegia

N Bonifer, PT, MS, NCS, is Physical Therapy Lead, Spalding Rehabilitation Hospital, 900 Potomac St, Aurora, CO 80011 (USA) (Nancy.Bonifer{at}HealthONEcares.com).
KM Anderson, OTR, is Staff Occupational Therapist, Spalding Rehabilitation Hospital

Address all correspondence to Ms Bonifer

Background and Purpose. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) has been documented to improve motor function in the upper extremity of people with mild hemiparesis. The use of CIMT has not been documented for people with severe hemiparesis. This case report describes a CIMT program for an individual with severe upper-extremity deficits as a result of stroke. Case Description. The client was a 53-year-old woman who had a stroke 15 years previously and had no isolated movement in her right upper extremity. Methods. The client completed a 3-week CIMT program during which she restrained her left upper extremity and participated in intensive training of her right upper extremity. Task practice and shaping were the primary techniques used for training. Outcomes. Increased scores were noted from pretreatment to posttreatment on the Motor Activity Log, Graded Wolf Motor Function Test (GWMFT), and Fugl-Meyer Evaluation of Physical Performance. Further progress on the GWMFT was noted at the 6-month follow-up. Fugl-Meyer test scores remained higher than at pretreatment, but Motor Activity Log scores returned to near baseline by the 6-month follow-up. The speed of performance on the GWFMT did not change. Although some scores increased, the client reported and demonstrated no progress in functional use of the involved upper extremity at the end of the program. Discussion. This case report describes the use of CIMT with an individual who had severe chronic motor deficits as a result of stroke. Further investigation of CIMT, as well as investigation of CIMT in combination with other motor recovery interventions, is warranted.

Key Words: Constraint-induced movement therapy • Hemiplegia • Learned nonuse • Rehabilitation • Stroke

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L Wolf Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1212 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J Page and P. Levine Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Patients With Chronic Stroke Exhibiting Minimal Movement Ability in the Affected Arm Physical Therapy, July 1, 2007; 87(7): 872 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L Scheets, S. A Sahrmann, and B. J Norton Use of Movement System Diagnoses in the Management of Patients With Neuromuscular Conditions: A Multiple-Patient Case Report Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 654 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Wolf, P. A. Thompson, D. M. Morris, D. K. Rose, C. J. Winstein, E. Taub, C. Giuliani, and S. L. Pearson The EXCITE Trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Patients with Subacute Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2005; 19(3): 194 - 205. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. R McEwen Case Reports: Slices of Real Life to Complement Evidence Physical Therapy, February 1, 2004; 84(2): 126 - 127. [Full Text]