PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 83, No. 5, May 2003, pp. 432-443

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jette, D. U
Right arrow Articles by Portney, L. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jette, D. U
Right arrow Articles by Portney, L. G

Research Reports

Construct Validation of a Model for Professional Behavior in Physical Therapist Students

Diane U Jette and Leslie G Portney

DU Jette, PT, DSc, is Professor and Director, Physical Therapy Program, Simmons College, 300 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115 (USA) (diane.jette{at}simmons.edu). Address all correspondence to Dr Jette
LG Portney, PT, DPT, PhD, FAPTA, is Associate Professor and Director, Professional Program in Physical Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Mass

Background and Purpose. For physical therapist educators, professional behavior has been difficult to define. The purpose of this study was to test the construct validity of a model of professional behavior that was previously established through consensus and reported in the literature. Subjects and Methods. One hundred eighty-three students from 2 professional programs participated in the study. Using a self-administered questionnaire, students assessed how frequently they performed 152 behaviors on a 7-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using principal components factor analysis. A Cronbach alpha was used to demonstrate internal consistency of items within each factor. Factor scores were submitted as dependent variables in analyses of variance to examine the differences in abilities according to amount of clinical education completed. Results. The analysis identified 7 factors that explained 52% of the variance. These factors were labeled Professionalism, Critical Thinking, Professional Development, Communication Management, Personal Balance, Interpersonal Skills, and Working Relationships. Cronbach alphas ranged from .81 to .95. Behaviors increased in frequency in 4 of the 7 areas identified according to the level of students' progress in the educational program. Discussion and Conclusion. The 7 factors corresponded fairly well to the 10 generic abilities previously identified. Although some behaviors may increase in frequency over the course of students' educational experience, others may be displayed at admission.

Key Words: Physical therapist education • Professional development • Professionalism




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. L Swisher, J. W Beckstead, and M. J Bebeau
Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis Using a Professional Role Orientation Inventory as an Example
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2004; 84(9): 784 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physical Therapy Association.