PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 84, No. 10, October 2004, pp. 906-918

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wrisley, D. M
Right arrow Articles by Whitney, S. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wrisley, D. M
Right arrow Articles by Whitney, S. L
Related Collections
Right arrow Gait Disorders
Right arrow Tests and Measurements
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Reliability, Internal Consistency, and Validity of Data Obtained With the Functional Gait Assessment

Diane M Wrisley, Gregory F Marchetti, Diane K Kuharsky and Susan L Whitney

DM Wrisley, PT, PhD, NCS, is Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, and Physical Therapist, Centers for Rehab Services, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa. This work was completed while she was a doctoral student in the Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa, and a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Balance Disorders Laboratory, Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Ore.
GF Marchetti, PT, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Rangos School of Health Professions, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pa
DK Kuharsky, SPT, BS, is a physical therapist student in the Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh
SL Whitney, PT, PhD, ATC, NCS, is Assistant Professor, Departments of Physical Therapy and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, and Director of Rehabilitation, Center for Vestibular Disorders, Centers for Rehab Services, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Address all correspondence to Dr Wrisley at Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Kimball Tower, 3435 Main St, Buffalo, NY 14214 (USA) (dwrisley{at}buffalo.edu)

Background and Purpose. The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a 10-item gait assessment based on the Dynamic Gait Index. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the FGA when used with people with vestibular disorders. Subjects. Seven physical therapists from various practice settings, 3 physical therapist students, and 6 patients with vestibular disorders volunteered to participate. Methods. All raters were given 10 minutes to review the instructions, the test items, and the grading criteria for the FGA. The 10 raters concurrently rated the performance of the 6 patients on the FGA. Patients completed the FGA twice, with an hour's rest between sessions. Reliability of total FGA scores was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1). Internal consistency of the FGA was assessed using the Cronbach alpha and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed using the correlation of the FGA scores with balance and gait measurements. Results. Intraclass correlation coefficients of .86 and .74 were found for interrater and intrarater reliability of the total FGA scores. Internal consistency of the FGA scores was .79. Spearman rank order correlation coefficients of the FGA scores with balance measurements ranged from .11 to .67. Discussion and Conclusion. The FGA demonstrates what we believe is acceptable reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity with other balance measures used for patients with vestibular disorders.

Key Words: Balance • Gait disorders,neurologic • Measurement,applied • Reliability • Validity • Vestibular system


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. R. Scherer and M. C. Schubert
Traumatic Brain Injury and Vestibular Pathology as a Comorbidity After Blast Exposure
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2009; 89(9): 980 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
G. F Marchetti, S. L Whitney, P. J Blatt, L. O Morris, and J. M Vance
Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Gait During Performance of the Dynamic Gait Index in People With and People Without Balance or Vestibular Disorders
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 640 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. L Walker, A. G Austin, G. M Banke, S. R Foxx, L. Gaetano, L. A Gardner, J. McElhiney, K. Morris, and L. Penn
Reference Group Data for the Functional Gait Assessment
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2007; 87(11): 1468 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
G. F Marchetti and S. L Whitney
Construction and Validation of the 4-Item Dynamic Gait Index
Physical Therapy, December 1, 2006; 86(12): 1651 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physical Therapy Association.