PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 84, No. 2, February 2004, pp. 151-158

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, M. C
Right arrow Articles by Herdman, S. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, M. C
Right arrow Articles by Herdman, S. J

Research Reports

Optimizing the Sensitivity of the Head Thrust Test for Identifying Vestibular Hypofunction

Michael C Schubert, Ronald J Tusa, Lawrence E Grine and Susan J Herdman

MC Schubert, PT, PhD, is Post-doctoral Fellow, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205 (USA) (mschube1{at}jhmi.edu)
RJ Tusa, MD, PhD, is Professor, Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga
LE Grine, PT, MSPT, is Physical Therapist, Spine & Sport Physical Therapy, Manassas, Va. He was a student in the Division of Physical Therapy at the University of Miami, Coral Gables, Fla, when this project was initiated
SJ Herdman, PT, PhD, FAPTA, is Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University

Address all correspondence to Dr Schubert

Background and Purpose. The head thrust test (HTT) is used to assess the vestibulo-ocular reflex. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) in patients following vestibular ablation is excellent (100%), although sensitivity is lower (35%–39%) for patients with nonsurgically induced UVH. The variability of the test results may be from moving the subject's head outside the plane of the lateral semicircular canals as well as using a head thrust of predictable timing and direction. The purpose of this study was to examine sensitivity and specificity of the horizontal HTT in identifying patients with UVH and bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH) when the head was flexed 30 degrees in attempt to induce acceleration primarily in the lateral semicircular canal and the head was moved unpredictably. Subjects. The medical records of 176 people with and without vestibular dysfunction (n=79 with UVH, n=32 with BVH, and n=65 with nonvestibular dizziness) were studied. Methods. Data were retrospectively tabulated from a de-identified database (ie, with health information stripped of all identifiers). Results. Sensitivity of the HTT for identifying vestibular hypofunction was 71% for UVH and 84% for BVH. Specificity was 82%. Discussion and Conclusion. Ensuring the head is pitched 30 degrees down and thrust with an unpredictable timing and direction appears to improve sensitivity of the HTT.

Key Words: Head thrust test • Sensitivity and specificity • Vestibular hypofunction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. C Schubert and L. B Minor
Vestibulo-ocular Physiology Underlying Vestibular Hypofunction
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2004; 84(4): 373 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physical Therapy Association.