HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fritz, J. M Articles by Childs, J. D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fritz, J. M Articles by Childs, J. D Related Collections Manual Therapy Injuries and Conditions: Low Back Outcomes Measurement Evidence-Based Practice Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Factors Related to the Inability of Individuals With Low Back Pain to Improve With a Spinal Manipulation

JM Fritz, PT, PhD, ATC, is Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, 6035 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 (USA) (jfritz{at}pitt.edu)
JM Whitman, PT, DSc, OCS, FAAOMPT, is Element Chief, Physical Therapy Element, Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, NM
TW Flynn, PT, PhD, OCS, FAAOMPT, is Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Regis University, Denver, Colo
RS Wainner, PT, PhD, OCS, ECS, FAAOMPT, is Assistant Professor, US Army-Baylor University Graduate Program in Physical Therapy
JD Childs, PT, PhD, MBA, OCS, CSCS, FAAOMPT, is Senior Physical Therapist and Director of Research, Department of Physical Therapy, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Tex
Dr Fritz, Dr Whitman, Dr Flynn, and Dr Wainner provided concept/idea/research design. Dr Fritz, Dr Flynn, Dr Wainner, and Dr Childs provided writing. Dr Whitman, Dr Flynn, and Dr Wainner provided data collection. Dr Fritz, Dr Whitman, and Dr Childs provided data analysis. Dr Flynn provided project management, and Dr Fritz provided fund procurement. Dr Fritz, Dr Flynn, and Dr Wainner provided subjects and facilities/equipment. Special thanks to Jake Magel, PT, DSc, OCS, FAAOMPT, Dan Rendeiro, PT, DSc, OCS, FAAOMPT, Matthew Garber, PT, DSc, OCS, FAAOMPT, and Barb Butler, PT, OCS, for their assistance in data collection. Special thanks to Stephen Allison, PT, PhD, ECS, for his assistance in the study design and statistical support

Address all correspondence to Dr Fritz

Background and Purpose. Although spinal manipulation is one of the few interventions for low back pain supported by evidence, it appears to be underutilized by physical therapists, possibly due to therapists' concerns that a patient may not benefit from the intervention. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that are associated with an inability to benefit from manipulation. Subjects. Seventy-five people with nonradicular low back pain (mean age=37.6 years, SD=10.6, range=19–59; mean duration of symptoms=41.7 days, SD=54.7, range=1–252) participated. Methods. Subjects underwent a standardized examination that included history-taking; self-reports of pain, disability, and fear-avoidance beliefs; measurement of lumbar and hip range of motion; and use of various tests. All subjects received a spinal manipulation intervention for a maximum of 2 sessions. Subjects who did not show greater than 5 points of improvement on the modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire were considered to have shown no improvement with the manipulation. Baseline variables were tested for univariate relationship with the outcome of the manipulation. Variables showing a univariate relationship were entered into a logistic regression equation, and adjusted odds ratios were calculated. Results. Twenty subjects (28%) did not improve with manipulation. Six variables were identified as being related to inability to improve with manipulation: longer symptom duration, having symptoms in the buttock or leg, absence of lumbar hypomobility, less hip rotation range of motion, less discrepancy in left-to-right hip medial rotation range of motion, and a negative Gaenslen sign. The resulting logistic regression model explained 63% of the variance in manipulation outcome. Discussion and Conclusion. The majority of subjects improved with manipulation. Baseline variables could be identified that were predictive of which subjects would not improve.

Key Words: Evidence-based practice • Low back pain • Spinal manipulation

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M Beneciuk, M. D Bishop, and S. Z George Clinical Prediction Rules for Physical Therapy Interventions: A Systematic Review Physical Therapy, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 114 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Landel, K. Kulig, M. Fredericson, B. Li, and C. M Powers Intertester Reliability and Validity of Motion Assessments During Lumbar Spine Accessory Motion Testing Physical Therapy, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D Childs and J. A Cleland Development and Application of Clinical Prediction Rules to Improve Decision Making in Physical Therapist Practice Physical Therapy, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 122 - 131. [Full Text] [PDF]