HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gregory, C. M Articles by Bickel, C S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gregory, C. M Articles by Bickel, C S.

Recruitment Patterns in Human Skeletal Muscle During Electrical Stimulation

CM Gregory, PT, PhD, is Research Associate, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Room 1142, HPNP Bldg, 101 S Newell Dr, Gainesville, FL 32610 (USA) (cgregory{at}phhp.ufl.edu)
CS Bickel, PT, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, La

Address all correspondence to Dr Gregory

Electromyostimulation (EMS) incorporates the use of electrical current to activate skeletal muscle and facilitate contraction. It is commonly used in clinical settings to mimic voluntary contractions and enhance the rehabilitation of human skeletal muscles. Although the beneficial effects of EMS are widely accepted, discrepancies concerning the specific responses to EMS versus voluntary actions exist. The unique effects of EMS have been attributed to several mechanisms, most notably a reversal of the recruitment pattern typically associated with voluntary muscle activation. This perspective outlines the authors' contention that electrical stimulation recruits motor units in a nonselective, spatially fixed, and temporally synchronous pattern. Furthermore, it synthesizes the evidence that supports the contention that this recruitment pattern contributes to increased muscle fatigue when compared with voluntary actions. The authors believe the majority of evidence suggests that EMS-induced motor unit recruitment is nonselective and that muscle fibers are recruited without obvious sequencing related to fiber types.

Key Words: Electrical stimulation • Muscle performance • Muscles

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Jubeau, A. Sartorio, P. G. Marinone, F. Agosti, J. V. Hoecke, K. Nosaka, and N. A. Maffiuletti Comparison between voluntary and stimulated contractions of the quadriceps femoris for growth hormone response and muscle damage J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2008; 104(1): 75 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Crameri, P. Aagaard, K. Qvortrup, H. Langberg, J. Olesen, and M. Kjaer Myofibre damage in human skeletal muscle: effects of electrical stimulation versus voluntary contraction J. Physiol., August 15, 2007; 583(1): 365 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R Piva, E. A Goodnite, K. Azuma, J. D Woollard, B. H Goodpaster, M. C. Wasko, and G K. Fitzgerald Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Volitional Exercise for Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Multiple-Patient Case Report Physical Therapy, August 1, 2007; 87(8): 1064 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Dean, L. M. Yates, and D. F. Collins Turning on the central contribution to contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 170 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Klakowicz, E. R. L. Baldwin, and D. F. Collins Contribution of M-Waves and H-Reflexes to Contractions Evoked by Tetanic Nerve Stimulation in Humans J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1293 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]