HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nosse, L. J Articles by Sagiv, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nosse, L. J Articles by Sagiv, L.

Theory-Based Study of the Basic Values of 565 Physical Therapists

LJ Nosse, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Marquette University, Room 346, Schroeder Health Science Complex, Milwaukee WI 53201-1881 (USA) (larry.nosse{at}marquette.edu)
L Sagiv, PhD, is Assistant Professor, School of Business Administration, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Address all correspondence to Dr Nosse

Background and Purpose. There is a prevailing belief expressed in the physical therapy literature that values influence behavioral choices. There is, however, meager research on physical therapists' values. A values theory was used to study the organization of physical therapists' basic values and to generate hypotheses about age-related value priority differences. Subjects. Participants were volunteers from the Wisconsin Physical Therapy Association (N=565). Methods. Values importance ratings were gathered using a modified Schwartz Values Survey. Demographic data were obtained with an investigator-developed questionnaire. Analyses included descriptive and nonparametric statistics and nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Results. The organizational structure of therapists' values was similar to the theoretical model. Physical therapists rated values associated with benevolence as most important and values associated with power as least important. Three of 7 age-related hypotheses were supported. Discussion and Conclusion. The theory adequately explained the organization of physical therapists' values and provided rational explanations for age-based value priority differences. Compared with occupationally heterogeneous samples, the results suggest that physical therapists highly prize values that benefit others and give remarkably little importance to values associated with power.

Key Words: Personal values • Social values • Values