|
|
||||||||
Research Reports |
JF Israel, PT, MSPT, is Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ill
DD Campbell, PTA, is Research Physical Therapist Assistant, Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Ill, and Research Coordinator, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
JH Kahn, PT, DPT, is Research Physical Therapist, Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
TG Hornby, PT, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612 (USA); Research Scientist, Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Ill; and Adjunct Research Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
Address all correspondence to Dr Hornby at: tgh{at}uic.edu
Background and Purpose. Robotic devices that provide passive guidance and stabilization of the legs and trunk during treadmill stepping may increase the delivery of locomotor training to subjects with neurological injury. Lower-extremity guidance also may reduce voluntary muscle activity as compared with compliant assistance provided by therapists. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in metabolic costs and lower-limb muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking. Subjects. Twelve ambulatory subjects with motor incomplete spinal cord injury participated. Methods. In 2 separate protocols, metabolic and electromyographic (EMG) data were collected during standing and stepping on a treadmill with therapist and robotic assistance. During robotic-assisted walking, subjects were asked to match the kinematic trajectories of the device and maximize their effort. During therapist-assisted walking, subjects walked on the treadmill with manual assistance provided as necessary. Results. Metabolic costs and swing-phase hip flexor EMG activity were significantly lower when subjects were asked to match the robotic device trajectories than with therapist-assisted walking. These differences were reduced when subjects were asked to maximize their effort during robotic-assisted stepping, although swing-phase plantar-flexor EMG activity was increased. In addition, during standing prior to therapist- or robotic-assisted stepping, metabolic costs were higher without stabilization from the robotic device. Discussion and Conclusion. Differences in metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns between therapist- and robotic-assisted standing and stepping illustrate the importance of minimizing passive guidance and stabilization provided during step training protocols.
Key Words: Gait training Locomotion Robotics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Banz, M. Bolliger, G. Colombo, V. Dietz, and L. Lunenburger Computerized Visual Feedback: An Adjunct to Robotic-Assisted Gait Training Physical Therapy, October 1, 2008; 88(10): 1135 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Hornby, D. D. Campbell, J. H. Kahn, T. Demott, J. L. Moore, and H. R. Roth Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1786 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A Mossberg, E. E Orlander, and J. L Norcross Cardiorespiratory Capacity After Weight-Supported Treadmill Training in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Physical Therapy, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 77 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |