HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nordin, E. Articles by Lundin-Olsson, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nordin, E. Articles by Lundin-Olsson, L.

Timed "Up & Go" Test: Reliability in Older People Dependent in Activities of Daily Living— Focus on Cognitive State

E Nordin, PT, MSc, is a doctoral student, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy and Geriatric Medicine, Umea University, SE-901 87 Umea, Sweden
E Rosendahl, PT, MSc, is a doctoral student, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy and Geriatric Medicine, Umea University
L Lundin-Olsson, PT, PhD, is Researcher, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy and Geriatric Medicine, Umea University

(ellinor.nordin{at}physiother.umu.se). Address all correspondence to Mrs Nordin

Background and Purpose. It is unknown how cognitive impairment affects the reliability of Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG) scores. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expected variability of TUG scores in older subjects dependent in activities of daily living (ADL) and with different levels of cognitive state. The hypothesis was that cognitive impairment would increase the variability of TUG scores. Subjects. Seventy-eight subjects with multiple impairments, dependent in ADL, and living in residential care facilities were included in this study. The subjects were 84.8±5.7 (mean±SD) years of age, and their Mini-Mental State Examination score was 18.7±5.6. Methods. The TUG assessments were performed on 3 different days. Intrarater and interrater analyses were carried out. Results. Cognitive impairment was not related to the size of the variability of TUG scores. There was a significant relationship between the variability and the time taken to perform the TUG. The intraclass correlations were greater than .90 and were similar within and between raters. In repeated measurements at the individual level, an observed value of 10 seconds was expected to vary from 7 to 15 seconds and an observed value of 40 seconds was expected to vary from 26 to 61 seconds for 95% of the observations. Discussion and Conclusion. The measurement error of a TUG assessment is substantial for a frail older person dependent in ADL, regardless of the level of cognitive function, when verbal cuing is permitted during testing. The variability increases with the time to perform the TUG. Despite high intraclass correlation coefficients, the ranges of expected variability can be wide and are similar within and between raters. Physical therapists should be aware of this variability before they interpret the TUG score for a particular individual.

Key Words: Cognition • Frailty • Geriatric assessment • Mobility • Reliability • Timed "Up & Go" Test • Variability

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Nordin, N. Lindelof, E. Rosendahl, J. Jensen, and L. Lundin-olsson Prognostic validity of the Timed Up-and-Go test, a modified Get-Up-and-Go test, staff's global judgement and fall history in evaluating fall risk in residential care facilities Age Ageing, July 1, 2008; 37(4): 442 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E Busse, H. Khalil, L. Quinn, and A. E Rosser Physical Therapy Intervention for People With Huntington Disease Physical Therapy, July 1, 2008; 88(7): 820 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Steffen and M. Seney Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change on Balance and Ambulation Tests, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale in People With Parkinsonism Physical Therapy, June 1, 2008; 88(6): 733 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Netz, S. Axelrad, and E. Argov Group physical activity for demented older adults feasibility and effectiveness Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 2007; 21(11): 977 - 986. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Sumukadas MBBS MD, M. D. Witham MBChB PhD, A. D. Struthers MBChB MD, and M. E.T. McMurdo MBChB MD Effect of perindopril on physical function in elderly people with functional impairment: a randomized controlled trial Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 9, 2007; 177(8): 867 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Conradsson, L. Lundin-Olsson, N. Lindelof, H. Littbrand, L. Malmqvist, Y. Gustafson, and E. Rosendahl Berg Balance Scale: Intrarater Test-Retest Reliability Among Older People Dependent in Activities of Daily Living and Living in Residential Care Facilities Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1155 - 1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]