HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ptj.20070255v1 88/5/652    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wagner, J. M Articles by Patten, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wagner, J. M Articles by Patten, C. Related Collections Kinesiology/Biomechanics Hemiplegia/Paraplegia/Quadriplegia Stroke (Neurology) Tests and Measurements Stroke (Geriatrics) Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke

JM Wagner, PT, PhD, is Research Health Scientist, Rehabilitation Research and Development Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif.
JA Rhodes, PT, MSPT, is a DPT student, University of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco State University, San Francisco, Calif.
C Patten, PT, PhD, was Research Scientist, Rehabilitation Research and Development Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, and Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif, at the time of this study. Dr Patten is now Research Scientist, Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, and Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, 1601 SW Archer Rd (151A), Gainesville, FL 32608 (USA).

Address all correspondence to Dr Patten at: patten{at}phhp.ufl.edu

Background and Purpose: Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching has emerged as an evaluative measure of upper-extremity motor performance in people after stroke. However, the psychometric properties supporting the use of kinematic data for evaluating longitudinal change in motor performance have not been established. The objective of this study was to determine, in a test-retest reliability manner, the reproducibility and minimal detectable change for reaching kinematics in people after stroke.

Subjects and Methods: Fourteen participants with hemiparesis after stroke performed forward reaching tasks on 2 occasions 37.3 (SD=9.8) days apart. At each session, participants performed 4 forward reaching tasks produced by the combination of 2 target heights (low and high [109 and 153 cm from the floor, respectively]) and 2 instructed movement speeds (self-selected and as fast as possible). Two analytical methods were used to calculate kinematic parameters.

Results: Relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) ranged from .04 to .99, and absolute reliability (standard error of measurement) ranged from 2.7% to 76.8%, depending on the kinematic variable, the demands of the motor task (target height and movement speed), and the analytical method. Bland-Altman analysis, a statistical method used to assess the repeatability of a method, revealed few systematic errors between sessions. The minimal detectable change ranged from 7.4% to 98.9%.

Discussion and Conclusion: Depending on the demands of the motor task and the analytical method, most kinematic outcome measures (such as peak hand velocity, endpoint error, reach extent, maximum shoulder flexion range of motion, and minimum elbow extension range of motion) are reliable measures of motor performance in people after stroke. However, because of the magnitude of within-subject measurement error, some variables (such as peak hand velocity, time to peak hand velocity, and movement time) must change considerably (>50%) to indicate a real change in individual participants. The results of our reliability analysis, which are based on our cohort of participants with hemiparesis after stroke and our specific paradigm, may not be generalizable to different subpopulations of people with hemiparesis after stroke or to the myriad movement tasks and kinematic variables used for the assessment of reaching performance in people after stroke.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K.-c. Lin, Y.-f. Chang, C.-y. Wu, and Y.-a. Chen Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Performance, Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 441 - 448. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K.-c. Lin, Y.-w. Hsieh, C.-y. Wu, C.-l. Chen, Y. Jang, and J.-s. Liu Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 429 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L Craik Climbing Out of Our Silos to Improve Practice Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 555 - 558. [Full Text] [PDF]